Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]
European Court of Human Rights
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> SKOBELEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 13038/18 (Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Third Section Committee) [2024] ECHR 247 (21 March 2024)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2024/247.html
Cite as: [2024] ECHR 247
[New search] [Contents list] [Help]
THIRD SECTION
CASE OF SKOBELEV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA
(Applications nos. 13038/18 and 39 others -
see appended list)
JUDGMENT
STRASBOURG
21 March 2024
This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.
In the case of Skobelev and Others v. Russia,
The European Court of Human Rights (Third Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:
Peeter Roosma, President,
Ioannis Ktistakis,
Andreas Zünd, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,
Having deliberated in private on 22 February 2024,
Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms ("the Convention") on the various dates indicated in the appended table.
2. The Russian Government ("the Government") were given notice of the applications.
THE FACTS
3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.
4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.
THE LAW
- JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS
5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.
- JURISDICTION
6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68-73, 17 January 2023).
- ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION
7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.
8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006-XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).
9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.
10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants' freedom of assembly were not "necessary in a democratic society".
11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.
- OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW
12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.
13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences (the CAO); Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.
- REMAINING COMPLAINTS
14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Article 6 of the Convention and under Article 4 of Protocol No. 7 concerning other aspects of fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in the above paragraphs, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.
- APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION
15. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case-law (see in particular Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,
- Decides to join the applications;
- Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with these applications as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;
- Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, and finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints;
- Holds that these applications disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;
- Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);
- Holds
(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;
(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 21 March 2024, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Viktoriya Maradudina Peeter Roosma
Acting Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention
(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)
Application no. Date of introduction | Applicant's name Year of birth
| Representative's name and location | Name of the public event Location Date | Administrative / criminal offence | Penalty | Final domestic decision Court Name Date | Other complaints under well-established case-law | Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)[1] | |
10/02/2018 | Yevgeniy SKOBELEV 1975 |
| Anti-corruption rally
St Petersburg
12/06/2017 | article 19.3 § 1 of CAO, article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | two fines of RUB 10,000 each | St Petersburg City Court 10/09/2017 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.51 p.m. until 9.53 p.m. on 12/06/2017;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings. | 4,000 | |
27/03/2019 | Yuriy Nikolayevich ZAVARIN 1987 | Laptev Aleksey Nikolayevich Moscow | Rally to call for fair elections
St Petersburg
05/05/2018 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 27/09/2018 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 3,500 | |
20/05/2019 | Aleksey Vladimirovich OTRYAKHIN 1986 | Yatsenko Irina Aleksandrovna Moscow | Opposition rally
Moscow
05/05/2018 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, and
article 19.3 § 1 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 and
fine RUB 1,000 | Moscow City Court 20/11/2018 (both sets of the proceedings)
| Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings - in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings
| 3,500 | |
08/09/2021 | Yelena Nikitichna SANNIKOVA 1959 | Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow | Rally "Free Azat Miftakhov"
Moscow
25/12/2020 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 06/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 4.20 p.m. until 10.30 p.m. on 25/12/2020;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
01/09/2021 | Andrey Aleksandrovich BALUSHKIN 2002 | Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich Belgorod | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Belgorod
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | 20 hours of community work | Belgorod Regional Court 01/03/2021 |
| 3,500 | |
01/09/2021 | Sergey Dmitriyevich KOTELNIKOV 2001 | Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich Belgorod | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Belgorod
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | 30 hours of community work | Belgorod Regional Court 01/03/2021 |
| 3,500 | |
07/09/2021 | Andrey Gennadyevich DEMIN 1960 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 04/03/2021 (decision served on the applicant after 07/03/2021)
| Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 until 00.15 a.m. on 24/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
02/09/2021 | Yevgeniy Andreyevich SELIVANOV 1989 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Volgograd
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO, article 20.2 § 2 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 and detention for 5 days | Volgograd Regional Court 11/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. until 10.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
02/09/2021 | Nikita Yuryevich KOZLOV 2001 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 8 days | Moscow City Court 02/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 6.04 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 6.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
16/09/2021 | Amir Damirovich FATTAKHOV 1994 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.43 p.m. until 10.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings
| 4,000 | |
09/09/2021 | Maksim Alekseyevich NIKITIN 2000 | Markin Konstantin Aleksandrovich Velikiy Novgorod | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Velikiy Novgorod
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | 20 hours of community work | Novgorod Regional Court 23/04/2021 |
| 4,000 | |
01/09/2021 | Yekaterina Nikolayevna LEZHNEVA 1997 | Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich Belgorod | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Belgorod
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Belgorod Regional Court 01/03/2021 |
| 3,500 | |
01/09/2021 | Artur Vladimirovich GARKOVSKIY 1993 | Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich Belgorod | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Belgorod
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | 20 hours of community work | Belgorod Regional Court 01/03/2021 |
| 3,500 | |
15/09/2021 | Kirill Yevgenyevich NADEZHDIN 1994 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Naberezhnye Chelny
23/01/2021
| article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 24/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 02/02/2021 for compiling an offence report | 4,000 | |
24/09/2021 | Sergey Nikolayevich POTANIN 1986 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Penza
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Penza Regional Court 01/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.15 p.m. until 6.45 p.m. on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
30/08/2021 | Aleksandr Konstantinovich KOTELNIKOV 1980 | Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 06/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
26/08/2021 | Yuriy Olegovich DMITRIYEV 1988 | Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan 31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of Tatarstan 17/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report | 4,000 | |
30/09/2021 | Pavel Borisovich MOREV 2002 | Valenkov Andrey Olegovich Nizhniy Novgorod | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Nizhniy Novgorod
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Court 31/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 6.00 p.m. on 01/02/2021
| 4,000 | |
22/08/2021 | Mars Vygyzovich KHUSAINOV 1982 | Antokhin Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 5 days | Moscow City Court 02/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2.25 p.m. on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
22/09/2021 | Olga Mikhaylovna BOGDANOVA 1985 | Antokhin Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 3 days | Moscow City Court 02/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 1.30 a.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO | 5,000 | |
22/09/2021 | Ilya Andreyevich MALOV 1986 | Antokhin Yevgeniy Vyacheslavovich Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | detention for 8 days | Moscow City Court 02/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.35 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 9.00 a.m. on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO
| 5,000 | |
24/09/2021 | Yuliya Aleksandrovna YUDINA 2000 | Kachanov Roman Yevgenyevich Yekaterinburg | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Yekaterinburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | 30 hours of community work | Sverdlovsk Regional Court 25/03/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
12/10/2021 | Vyacheslav Igorevich PYATAKOV 2002 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Moscow City Court 12/04/2021 | Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings;
Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 10.05. a.m. until 3.20 p.m. on 02/02/2021 | 4,000 | |
10/10/2021 | Viktoriya Vladimirovna KOZYREVA 1996 | Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich Belgorod | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Belgorod
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Belgorod Regional Court 09/08/2021 |
| 3,500 | |
10/10/2021 | Tatyana Andreyevna KUPRIYENKO 1960 | Tkachenko Nikita Nikolayevich Belgorod | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Belgorod
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 2 of CAO | fine of RUB 5,000 | Belgorod Regional Court 28/06/2021 |
| 3,500 | |
11/11/2021 | Tagir Rovshanovich ALIYEV 1999 | Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
St Petersburg
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | St Petersburg City Court 11/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to the police station on 31/01/2021 for compiling an offence report | 4,000 | |
20/10/2021 | Anna Dmitriyevna SHARONOVA 1999 | Nurgaleyev Danil Ilnurovich Kazan | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kazan
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 2 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Supreme Court of the Tatarstan Republic 02/06/2021 |
| 3,500 | |
11/10/2021 | Yelizaveta Aleksandrovna REMESLOVA 1996 | Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Krasnoyarsk
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 13/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.20 p.m. until 7.00 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
11/11/2021 | Daniil Anatolyevich DUMANSKIY 1992 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Bryansk
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Bryansk Regional Court 11/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.25 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 4.00 p.m. on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
29/10/2021 | Anastasiya Ivanovna KORSHUNOVA 1984 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Kursk
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Kursk Regional Court 29/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.42 p.m. until 7.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
29/10/2021 | Nikita Olegovich PORTNOV 2001 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Samara
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Samara Regional Court 29/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. until 9.00 p.m. on 23/01/2021 | 4,000 | |
10/11/2021 | Mariya Vadimovna DRACHEVA 1994 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Tomsk
21/04/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 18,000 | Tomsk Regional Court 21/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 8.00 p.m. on 21/04/2021 until 00.30 a.m. on 22/04/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
18/11/2021 | Georgiy Pavlovich KRYUCHKOV 2000 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.47 p.m. on 02/02/2021 until 05.30 a.m. on 03/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
18/11/2021 | Aleksandr Igorevich ANDROSOV 1981 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 21/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021 until 2.00 a.m. on 01/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
18/11/2021 | Irina Gennadyevna TUGOLUKOVA 1975 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 11.55. a.m. to 8.20 p.m. on 31/01/2021
| 4,000 | |
18/11/2021 | Sergey Viktorovich FILATOV 1975 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
23/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 20,000 | Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 5.30 p.m. on 23/01/2021 until 01.45 a.m. on 24/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
10/11/2021 | Yelena Igorevna NAUMOVA 1991 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Vladivostok
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | 30 hours of community work | Primorye Regional Court 11/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 3.36 p.m. until 9.45 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
26/10/2021 | Aleksey Romanovich CHIZHIKOV 2001 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Vladivostok
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 7,500 | Primorskiy Regional Court 27/04/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.05 p.m. until 9.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
18/11/2021 | Aleksandr Alkeseyevich KOSTYUKHIN 1958 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Moscow
02/02/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 10,000 | Moscow City Court 19/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 1.30 p.m. until 7.40 p.m. on 02/02/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 | |
18/11/2021 | Margarita Aleksandrovna MALTSEVA 2002 | Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow | Rally "Free Navalnyy"
Vladivostok
31/01/2021 | article 20.2 § 5 of CAO | fine of RUB 15,000 | Primorskiy Regional Court 25/05/2021 | Art. 5 (1) - unlawful detention - escorting to and detention at the police station after compiling an offence report from 2.05 p.m. until 9.30 p.m. on 31/01/2021;
Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings | 4,000 |
[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.