British and Irish Legal Information Institute

Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

European Court of Human Rights

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> PUKHOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 59975/13 (Judgment : Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Fifth Section Committee) [2023] ECHR 461 (08 June 2023)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2023/461.html
Cite as: CE:ECHR:2023:0608JUD005997513, ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0608JUD005997513, [2023] ECHR 461

[New search] [Contents list] [Help]

FIFTH SECTION

CASE OF PUKHOV AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

(Applications nos. 59975/13 and 25 others –

see appended list)

JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG

8 June 2023

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of Pukhov and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

          María Elósegui, President,
          Mattias Guyomar,
          Kateřina Šimáčková, judges,
and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 17 May 2023,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE

1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.

2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS

3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.

4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies. Some applicants also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

II. JURISDICTION

6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).

III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION

7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers or participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.

8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).

9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having taken into account the issue of compliance with the six-month time-limit under Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Saakashvili v. Georgia (dec.), nos. 6232/20 and 22394/20, §§ 46-59, 1 March 2022, in which the Court addressed the COVID-related extension of the period in question), the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.

11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.

IV. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW

12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention and its Protocols, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.

13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that these complaints also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 63-65, 13 February 2018, Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 115-31, 10 April 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to various aspects of unlawful deprivation of liberty of organisers or participants of public assemblies; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, concerning the absence of a prosecuting party in the proceedings under the Code of Administrative Offences; and Tsvetkova and Others, cited above, §§ 186-88, and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, relating to the lack of suspensive effect on an appeal against the sentence of detention.

V. REMAINING COMPLAINTS

14. Some applicants raised further additional complaints under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of their deprivation of liberty and fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings. In view of the findings in paragraphs 11-13 above, the Court considers that there is no need to deal separately with these remaining complaints.

15. The Court has further examined the remainder of the complaints raised by the applicants in applications nos. 39315/18 and 42500/18 and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.

VI. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

16. Regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see, in particular, Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

1. Decides to join the applications;

2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with the applicants’ complaints as they relate to facts that took place before 16 September 2022;

3. Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Articles 5 and 6 of the Convention, and declares the remainder of applications nos. 39315/18 and 42500/18 inadmissible;

4. Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;

5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);

6. Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 8 June 2023, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Viktoriya Maradudina María Elósegui
Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention

(disproportionate measures against organisers and participants of public assemblies)

Application no. Date of introduction	Applicant’s name Year of birth	Representative’s name and location	Name of the public event Location Date	Administrative charges	Penalty	Final domestic decision Court Name Date	Other complaints under well‑established case-law	Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros)^{^[1]}
59975/13 12/09/2013	Stanislav Sergeyevich PUKHOV 1985	Davidyan Eleonora Grantovna Moscow	Rally against the conviction of the Pussy Riot group members Moscow 17/08/2012	Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO	fine of RUB 20,000	Khamovnicheskiy District Court of Moscow 12/03/2013	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings	3,500
3930/17 30/12/2016	Valeriy Yuryevich NADEZHDIN 1968	Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi	March for Change Moscow 12/12/2015	Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Moscow City Court 08/07/2016	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station and detention on 12/12/2015 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings	4,000
16608/18 22/03/2018	Dmitriy Viktorovich TOLMACHEV 1970	Ivanets Vyacheslav Sergeyevich Tbilisi, Georgia	Event to inform voters about A. Navalnyy’s activity Irkutsk 04/11/2017	Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO	administrative arrest of 5 days	Irkutsk Regional Court 22/11/2017		5,000
21537/18 30/04/2018	Aleksandr Vyacheslavovich TITOV 1977	Tiunov Sergey Yuryevich Yekaterinburg	Rally to support A. Navalnyy Yekaterinburg 07/10/2017	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Sverdlovsk Regional Court 05/12/2017		3,500
27432/18 18/05/2018	Rafail Viktorovich SHEPELEV 1970	Tiunov Sergey Yuryevich Yekaterinburg	Rally to support A.Navalnyy Yekaterinburg 07/10/2017	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	33 hours of compulsory work	Sverdlovsk Regional Court 12/12/2017		3,500
31917/18 21/06/2018	Olga Alekseyevna ZENINA 1952	Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius	Rally to support A. Navalnyy Rostov-on-Don 07/10/2017 Rally to support A. Navalnyy Rostov-on-Don 24/12/2017	Article 20.2 § 6.1 of the CAO Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000 fine of RUB 10,000	Rostov Regional Court 21/12/2017 Rostov Regional Court 20/03/2018	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - both sets of the CAO proceedings	3,500
39315/18 07/08/2018	Vladimir Sergeyevich NEMANOV 1996	Terekhov Konstantin Ilyich Moscow	"Voters’ strike" rally Kaliningrad 28/01/2018	Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO	administrative detention of 10 days	Kaliningrad Regional Court 12/02/2018	Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the court of first instance was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO	5,000
42500/18 30/08/2018 and 19787/19 01/04/2019	Tatyana Viktorovna SPORYSHEVA 1976	42500/18 Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius 19787/19 Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius	Rally to support A. Navalnyy Rostov-on-Don 24/12/2017 Rally against the pension reform Rostov-on-Don 09/09/2018	Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO	fine of RUB 15,000 administrative detention of 1 day	Rostov Regional Court 07/03/2018 Rostov Regional Court 09/10/2018	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 09/09/2018 and 10/09/2018 as administrative suspect, Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - both sets of the CAO proceedings	4,000
47782/18 21/09/2018	Irina Aleksandrovna NEVEROVA 1989	Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow	Manifestation to support Mr Navalny’s campaign Perm 07/10/2017	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Perm Regional Court 21/03/2018	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings	3,500
49185/18 10/10/2018	Artem Valeryevich VAZHENKOV 1981	Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius	Rally in support of A. Navalnyy Tver 07/07/2017 Political manifestation Tver 05/05/2018 Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma Moscow 27/07/2019	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000 administrative detention of 5 days fine of RUB 10,000	Tver Regional Court 17/05/2018 Tver Regional Court 17/05/2018 Moscow City Court 24/09/2019	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - all sets of administrative-offence proceedings, Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention (i) between 00.30 a.m. on 06/05/2018 and 2.40 p.m. on 07/05/2018 as administrative suspect; and (ii) between 27/07/2019 and 29/07/2019 as administrative suspect, for "drawing up the administrative offence record" (such record compiled on 28/07/2019).	5,000
52537/18 24/10/2018	Sergey Sergeyevich TSUKASOV 1968	Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan	Mother’s Day in Ostankino Moscow 11/03/2018	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 20,000	Moscow City Court 06/06/2018	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of the prosecuting party in the administrative proceedings	3,500
10407/19 09/02/2019	Ruslan Adamovich MUTSOLGOV 1977	Sabinin Andrey Vasilyevich Stavropol	Rally against transfer of a part of the territory of the Republic of Ingushetia to the Chechen Republic Magas 26/09/2018	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Supreme Court of the Republic of Ingushetia 06/11/2018	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings	3,500
18178/19 26/03/2019	Aleksandra Vladimirovna SEMENOVA 1979	Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow	Opposition manifestation "He is not our Tsar" Perm 05/05/2018	Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO	fine of RUB 150,000	Perm Regional Court 26/09/2018	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings	5,500
21750/19 03/04/2019	Igor Vladimirovich PUSHKAR 1962	Sholokhov Igor Nikolayevich Kazan	Rally against the pension reform Omsk 09/09/2018	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Omsk Regional Court 15/01/2019	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty‑ arrest, escorting to a police station, detention on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings	4,000
23746/19 15/04/2019	Vladimir Anatolyevich PEREKOTIY 1962	Vasin Vladimir Valeryevich Krasnoyarsk	Opposition rally Krasnoyarsk 05/05/2018 Rally against the pension reform Krasnoyarsk 09/09/2018 Rally in support of A. Navalnyy Krasnoyarsk 23/01/2021 Rally in support of A. Navalnyy Krasnoyarsk 31/01/2021	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO	30 hours of community work fine of RUB 10,000 100 hours of community work fine of RUB 150,000	Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 25/10/2018 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 28/03/2019 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 01/04/2021 Krasnoyarsk Regional Court 01/04/2021	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty– (i) arrest, escorting to a police station, detention on 05/05/2018 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; (ii) arrest and detention between 31/01/2021 and 02/02/2021 as administrative suspect, for compiling the administrative offence record in respect of the events of 23/01/2021 (drawn up on 02/02/2021), pending the examination of the case by the first-instance court; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - all sets of the CAO proceedings	5,500
25576/19 29/04/2019	Yevgeniy Valikhanovich MUSIN 1980	Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg	Rally against abusive criminal prosecution St Petersburg 28/10/2018	Article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO	fine of RUB 20,000	St Petersburg City Court 10/01/2019	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 28/10/2018 and 29/10/2018 as administrative suspect, Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings	4,000
40242/19 17/07/2019	Vladimir Yuryevich SHIPITSYN 1969	Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich Saint-Barthélemy d’Anjou	Rally against abusive criminal prosecution St Petersburg 28/10/2018	Article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO	fine of RUB 15,000	St Petersburg City Court 17/01/2019	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 28/10/2018 and 29/10/2018 as administrative suspect "for a correct and timely determination of the case", Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings	4,000
63403/19 28/11/2019	Anzhela Khusenovna MATIYEVA 1971	Sabinin Andrey Vasilyevich Stavropol	Rally concerning the regional statute on referenda Magas 06/10/2018	Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Supreme Court of the Ingushetia Republic 11/07/2019	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings	3,500
1720/20 18/12/2019	Vadim Miroslavovich YASKIV 1989	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma Moscow 03/08/2019	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 20,000	Moscow City Court 28/08/2019	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station and detention on 03/08/2019 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings	4,000
3878/20 20/12/2019	Sergey Dmitriyevich SOLOVYEV 1999	Yatsenko Irina Aleksandrovna Moscow	Opposition manifestation Moscow 05/05/2018 Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma Moscow 27/07/2019	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000 fine of RUB 200,000	Moscow City Court 20/06/2019 Moscow City Court 30/09/2019	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station and detention (i) on 05/05/2018, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; delayed escorting to a police station; and (ii) on 27/07/2019 for the same purpose (administrative‑offence record drawn up on 30/07/2019 only), Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - both sets of administrative proceedings	4,000
6350/20 17/01/2020	Dmitriy Sergeyevich KNYAZEV 1983	Memorial Human Rights Centre Moscow	Manifestation in support of I. Golunov Moscow 12/06/2019	Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Moscow City Court 02/08/2019	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings	3,500
9088/20 03/02/2020	Marina Aleksandrovna LUKYANETS 1976	Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi	Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma Moscow 14/07/2019	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 15,000	Moscow City Court 06/09/2019	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty -- arrest, escorting to a police station, detention on 14/07/2019 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence, Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings	4,000
15309/20 29/02/2020	Roman Igorevich MAKSIMOV 1995	Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg	Event for fair elections St Petersburg 29/06/2019	Article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO	fine of RUB 20,000	St Petersburg City Court 12/09/2019	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention between 6.20 p.m. on 29/06/2019 and 1.20 a.m. on 30/06/2019 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; no record of administrative arrest compiled, Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings	4,000
17354/20 14/03/2020	Darya Aleksandrovna BELYAYEVA 1991	Kachanov Roman Yevgenyevich Yekaterinburg	Rally against a church construction Yekaterinburg 04/06/2019	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	Sverdlovsk Regional Court 18/09/2019		3,500
17906/20 30/03/2020	Nikolay Igorevich NIKIFOROV 1995	Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius	Rally against the pension reform St Petersburg 09/09/2018	Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO	fine of RUB 10,000	St Petersburg City Court 14/11/2019		3,500

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location

Name of

the public event

Location

Date

Administrative charges

Penalty

Final domestic decision

Court Name

Date

Other complaints under well‑established case-law

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros)^{^[1]}

59975/13

12/09/2013

Stanislav Sergeyevich PUKHOV

1985

Davidyan
Eleonora Grantovna

Moscow

Rally against the conviction of the Pussy Riot group members

Moscow

17/08/2012

Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Khamovnicheskiy District Court of Moscow

12/03/2013

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings

3,500

3930/17

30/12/2016

Valeriy
Yuryevich NADEZHDIN

1968

Zboroshenko
Nikolay Sergeyevich

Mytishchi

March for Change

Moscow

12/12/2015

Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

08/07/2016

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station and detention on 12/12/2015 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence,

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings

4,000

16608/18

22/03/2018

Dmitriy Viktorovich TOLMACHEV

1970

Ivanets
Vyacheslav Sergeyevich

Tbilisi, Georgia

Event to inform voters about A. Navalnyy’s activity

Irkutsk

04/11/2017

Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

administrative arrest of 5 days

Irkutsk Regional Court

22/11/2017

5,000

21537/18

30/04/2018

Aleksandr Vyacheslavovich TITOV

1977

Tiunov
Sergey Yuryevich

Yekaterinburg

Rally to support A. Navalnyy

Yekaterinburg

07/10/2017

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Sverdlovsk Regional Court

05/12/2017

3,500

27432/18

18/05/2018

Rafail
Viktorovich SHEPELEV

1970

Tiunov
Sergey Yuryevich

Yekaterinburg

Rally to support A.Navalnyy

Yekaterinburg

07/10/2017

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

33 hours of compulsory work

Sverdlovsk Regional Court

12/12/2017

3,500

31917/18

21/06/2018

Olga
Alekseyevna ZENINA

1952

Zhdanov
Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Rally to support A. Navalnyy

Rostov-on-Don

07/10/2017

Rally to support A. Navalnyy

Rostov-on-Don

24/12/2017

Article 20.2 § 6.1 of the CAO

Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Rostov Regional Court

21/12/2017

Rostov Regional Court

20/03/2018

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - both sets of the CAO proceedings

3,500

39315/18

07/08/2018

Vladimir Sergeyevich NEMANOV

1996

Terekhov
Konstantin Ilyich

Moscow

"Voters’ strike" rally

Kaliningrad

28/01/2018

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

administrative detention of 10 days

Kaliningrad Regional Court

12/02/2018

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the court of first instance was executed immediately, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO

5,000

42500/18

30/08/2018

and

19787/19

01/04/2019

Tatyana Viktorovna SPORYSHEVA

1976

42500/18

Zhdanov
Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

19787/19

Pomazuyev
Aleksandr Yevgenyevich

Vilnius

Rally to support A. Navalnyy

Rostov-on-Don

24/12/2017

Rally against the pension reform

Rostov-on-Don

09/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

administrative detention of 1 day

Rostov Regional Court

07/03/2018

Rostov Regional Court

09/10/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 09/09/2018 and 10/09/2018 as administrative suspect,

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - both sets of the CAO proceedings

4,000

47782/18

21/09/2018

Irina Aleksandrovna NEVEROVA

1989

Pershakova
Yelena Yuryevna

Moscow

Manifestation to support Mr Navalny’s campaign

Perm

07/10/2017

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Perm Regional Court

21/03/2018

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings

3,500

49185/18

10/10/2018

Artem
Valeryevich VAZHENKOV

1981

Zhdanov
Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Rally in support of A. Navalnyy

Tver

07/07/2017

Political
manifestation

Tver

05/05/2018

Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma

Moscow

27/07/2019

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

administrative detention of 5 days

fine of RUB 10,000

Tver Regional Court

17/05/2018

Tver Regional Court

17/05/2018

Moscow City Court

24/09/2019

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - all sets of administrative-offence proceedings,

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention (i) between 00.30 a.m. on 06/05/2018 and 2.40 p.m. on 07/05/2018 as administrative suspect; and (ii) between 27/07/2019 and 29/07/2019 as administrative suspect, for "drawing up the administrative offence record" (such record compiled on 28/07/2019).

5,000

52537/18

24/10/2018

Sergey
Sergeyevich TSUKASOV

1968

Sholokhov
Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

Mother’s Day in Ostankino

Moscow

11/03/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

06/06/2018

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of tribunal - absence of the prosecuting party in the administrative proceedings

3,500

10407/19

09/02/2019

Ruslan
Adamovich MUTSOLGOV

1977

Sabinin
Andrey Vasilyevich

Stavropol

Rally against transfer of a part of the territory of the Republic of Ingushetia to the Chechen Republic

Magas

26/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Supreme Court of the Republic of Ingushetia

06/11/2018

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings

3,500

18178/19

26/03/2019

Aleksandra Vladimirovna SEMENOVA

1979

Pershakova
Yelena Yuryevna

Moscow

Opposition manifestation "He is not our Tsar"

Perm

05/05/2018

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

fine of RUB 150,000

Perm Regional Court

26/09/2018

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings

5,500

21750/19

03/04/2019

Igor
Vladimirovich PUSHKAR

1962

Sholokhov
Igor Nikolayevich

Kazan

Rally against the pension reform

Omsk

09/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Omsk Regional Court

15/01/2019

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty‑ arrest, escorting to a police station, detention on 09/09/2018 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence,

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings

4,000

23746/19

15/04/2019

Vladimir Anatolyevich PEREKOTIY

1962

Vasin
Vladimir Valeryevich

Krasnoyarsk

Opposition rally

Krasnoyarsk

05/05/2018

Rally against the pension reform

Krasnoyarsk

09/09/2018

Rally in support of A. Navalnyy

Krasnoyarsk

23/01/2021

Rally in support of A. Navalnyy

Krasnoyarsk

31/01/2021

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

30 hours of community work

fine of RUB 10,000

100 hours of community work

fine of RUB 150,000

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

25/10/2018

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

28/03/2019

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

01/04/2021

Krasnoyarsk Regional Court

01/04/2021

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty– (i) arrest, escorting to a police station, detention on 05/05/2018 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; (ii) arrest and detention between 31/01/2021 and 02/02/2021 as administrative suspect, for compiling the administrative offence record in respect of the events of 23/01/2021 (drawn up on 02/02/2021), pending the examination of the case by the first-instance court;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - all sets of the CAO proceedings

5,500

25576/19

29/04/2019

Yevgeniy Valikhanovich MUSIN

1980

Peredruk
Aleksandr Dmitriyevich

St Petersburg

Rally against abusive criminal prosecution

St Petersburg

28/10/2018

Article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

St Petersburg City Court

10/01/2019

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 28/10/2018 and 29/10/2018 as administrative suspect,

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings

4,000

40242/19

17/07/2019

Vladimir Yuryevich SHIPITSYN

1969

Mezak
Ernest Aleksandrovich

Saint-Barthélemy d’Anjou

Rally against abusive criminal prosecution

St Petersburg

28/10/2018

Article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

St Petersburg City Court

17/01/2019

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station, detention between 28/10/2018 and 29/10/2018 as administrative suspect "for a correct and timely determination of the case",

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings

4,000

63403/19

28/11/2019

Anzhela Khusenovna MATIYEVA

1971

Sabinin
Andrey Vasilyevich

Stavropol

Rally concerning the regional statute on referenda

Magas

06/10/2018

Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Supreme Court of the Ingushetia Republic

11/07/2019

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings

3,500

1720/20

18/12/2019

Vadim Miroslavovich YASKIV

1989

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma

Moscow

03/08/2019

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

28/08/2019

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station and detention on 03/08/2019 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence,

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings

4,000

3878/20

20/12/2019

Sergey Dmitriyevich SOLOVYEV

1999

Yatsenko
Irina Aleksandrovna

Moscow

Opposition manifestation

Moscow

05/05/2018

Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma

Moscow

27/07/2019

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

fine of RUB 200,000

Moscow City Court

20/06/2019

Moscow City Court

30/09/2019

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest, escorting to a police station and detention (i) on 05/05/2018, for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; delayed escorting to a police station; and (ii) on 27/07/2019 for the same purpose (administrative‑offence record drawn up on 30/07/2019 only),

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings - both sets of administrative proceedings

4,000

6350/20

17/01/2020

Dmitriy Sergeyevich KNYAZEV

1983

Memorial Human Rights Centre

Moscow

Manifestation in support of I. Golunov

Moscow

12/06/2019

Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

02/08/2019

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings

3,500

9088/20

03/02/2020

Marina Aleksandrovna LUKYANETS

1976

Zboroshenko
Nikolay Sergeyevich

Mytishchi

Manifestation for fair elections to Mosgorduma

Moscow

14/07/2019

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court

06/09/2019

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty -- arrest, escorting to a police station, detention on 14/07/2019 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence,

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings

4,000

15309/20

29/02/2020

Roman
Igorevich MAKSIMOV

1995

Peredruk
Aleksandr Dmitriyevich

St Petersburg

Event for fair elections

St Petersburg

29/06/2019

Article 20.2.2 § 1 of CAO

fine of RUB 20,000

St Petersburg City Court

12/09/2019

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty - arrest and detention between 6.20 p.m. on 29/06/2019 and 1.20 a.m. on 30/06/2019 for the sole purpose of drawing up a record of administrative offence; no record of administrative arrest compiled,

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings

4,000

17354/20

14/03/2020

Darya Aleksandrovna BELYAYEVA

1991

Kachanov
Roman Yevgenyevich

Yekaterinburg

Rally against a church construction

Yekaterinburg

04/06/2019

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

Sverdlovsk Regional Court

18/09/2019

3,500

17906/20

30/03/2020

Nikolay
Igorevich NIKIFOROV

1995

Pomazuyev
Aleksandr Yevgenyevich

Vilnius

Rally against the pension reform

St Petersburg

09/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

14/11/2019

3,500

[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

About BAILII - FAQ - Copyright Policy - Disclaimers - Privacy Policy amended on 25/11/2010