British and Irish Legal Information Institute

Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

European Court of Human Rights

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> UVARKINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA - 70089/12 (Judgment : Article 11 - Freedom of assembly and association : Fourth Section Committee) [2023] ECHR 330 (13 April 2023)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2023/330.html
Cite as: [2023] ECHR 330, ECLI:CE:ECHR:2023:0413JUD007008912, CE:ECHR:2023:0413JUD007008912

[New search] [Contents list] [Help]

FOURTH SECTION

CASE OF UVARKINA AND OTHERS v. RUSSIA

(Applications nos. 70089/12 and 40 others –

see appended list)

JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG

13 April 2023

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of Uvarkina and Others v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

          Faris Vehabović, President,
          Armen Harutyunyan,
          Anja Seibert-Fohr, judges,

and Viktoriya Maradudina, Acting Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 23 March 2023,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE

1. The case originated in applications against Russia lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) on the various dates indicated in the appended table.

2. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were given notice of the applications.

THE FACTS

3. The list of applicants and the relevant details of the applications are set out in the appended table.

4. The applicants complained of the disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers and participants of public assemblies. They also raised other complaints under the provisions of the Convention.

THE LAW

I. JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

5. Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

II. jurisdiction

6. The Court observes that the facts giving rise to the alleged violations of the Convention occurred prior to 16 September 2022, the date on which the Russian Federation ceased to be a party to the Convention. The Court therefore decides that it has jurisdiction to examine the present applications (see Fedotova and Others v. Russia [GC], nos. 40792/10 and 2 others, §§ 68‑73, 17 January 2023).

III. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 11 OF THE CONVENTION

7. The applicants complained principally of disproportionate measures taken against them as organisers and participants of public assemblies, namely their arrest in relation to the dispersal of these assemblies, and their conviction for administrative offences. They relied, expressly or in substance, on Article 11 of the Convention.

8. The Court refers to the principles established in its case-law regarding freedom of assembly (see Kudrevičius and Others v. Lithuania [GC], no. 37553/05, ECHR 2015, with further references) and proportionality of interference with it (see Oya Ataman v. Turkey, no. 74552/01, ECHR 2006‑XIV, and Hyde Park and Others v. Moldova, no. 33482/06, 31 March 2009).

9. In the leading cases of Frumkin v. Russia, no. 74568/12, ECHR 2016 (extracts), Navalnyy and Yashin v. Russia, no. 76204/11, 4 December 2014 and Kasparov and Others v. Russia, no. 21613/07, 3 October 2013, the Court already found a violation in respect of issues similar to those in the present case.

10. Having examined all the material submitted to it, and having due regard to the issue of compliance with the six-month period under Article 35 § 1 of the Convention (see Saakashvili v. Georgia (dec.), nos. 6232/20 and 22394/20, §§ 46-59, 1 March 2022, in which the Court addressed the COVID‑related extension of the period in question), the Court has not found any fact or argument capable of persuading it to reach a different conclusion as to the admissibility and merits of these complaints. Having regard to its case-law on the subject, the Court considers that in the instant case the interferences with the applicants’ freedom of assembly were not “necessary in a democratic society”.

11. These complaints are therefore admissible and disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention.

IV. OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS UNDER WELL-ESTABLISHED CASE-LAW

12. Some applicants submitted other complaints which also raised issues under the Convention, given the relevant well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table). These complaints are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention, nor are they inadmissible on any other ground. Accordingly, they must be declared admissible.

13. Having examined all the material before it, the Court concludes that they also disclose violations of the Convention and its Protocols in the light of its findings in Butkevich v. Russia, no. 5865/07, §§ 61-65, 13 February 2018, and Korneyeva v. Russia, no. 72051/17, §§ 34-36, 8 October 2019, as to administrative escorting to and detention in a police station beyond three hours without any justification; Karelin v. Russia, no. 926/08, §§ 58-85, 20 September 2016, related to the absence of a prosecuting party in criminal proceedings governed by the Code of Administrative Offences (“the CAO”); Lashmankin and Others v. Russia, nos. 57818/09 and 14 others, §§ 402-78, 7 February 2017, regarding restrictions on location or time of public events; Tsvetkova and Others v. Russia, nos. 54381/08 and 5 others, §§ 179-91, 10 April 2018, and Martynyuk v. Russia, no. 13764/15, §§ 38-42, 8 October 2019, related to the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal against the sentence of administrative detention.

V. REMAINING COMPLAINTS

14. Some applicants also raised other complaints under various Articles of the Convention.

15. Firstly, the Court considers that, in view of its findings in paragraphs 11 and 13 above, there is no need to deal separately with the remaining complaints raised by some applicants under Article 6 of the Convention concerning other aspects of the fairness of the administrative-offence proceedings.

16. Furthermore, the Court has examined the rest of the complaints raised by the applicants and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, these complaints either do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention or do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms enshrined in the Convention or the Protocols thereto.

17. It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.

VI. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

18. Article 41 of the Convention provides:

“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”

19. Having regard to the nature of the complaint raised by Mr Ishutin in application no. 70440/17, the Court considers that the finding of a violation, triggering the respondent State’s obligation to take measures aimed at ensuring the respect of the right to freedom of assembly indicated in the judgment of Alekseyev and Others v. Russia, nos. 14988/09 and 50 others, §§ 27-29, 27 November 2018, constitutes sufficient just satisfaction in that case (see, for a similar approach, Alekseyev and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 26624/15 and 76 others, § 18, 16 January 2020, Zverev and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 26363/18 and 2 others, § 15, 7 July 2022, and Taratunin and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 2051/18 and 4 others, § 14, 28 July 2022)

20. As to the remaining applicants, regard being had to the documents in its possession and to its case‑law (see, in particular, Navalnyy and Others v. Russia [Committee], nos. 25809/17 and 14 others, § 22, 4 October 2022), the Court finds it reasonable to award the sums indicated in the appended table.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

1. Decides to join the applications;

2. Holds that it has jurisdiction to deal with the applicants’ complaints as they relate to the facts that took place before 16 September 2022;

3. Declares the complaints under Article 11 of the Convention and the other complaints under the well-established case-law of the Court, as set out in the appended table, admissible, finds that there is no need to examine separately the remaining complaints under Article 6 of the Convention and declares the remainder of the applications inadmissible;

4. Holds that these complaints disclose a breach of Article 11 of the Convention;

5. Holds that there has been a violation of the Convention and the Protocols thereto as regards the other complaints raised under the well-established case-law of the Court (see appended table);

6. Holds that the finding of the violation of Article 11 in respect of Mr Ishutin in application no. 70440/17 constitutes in itself sufficient just satisfaction;

7. Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay the remaining applicants, within three months, the amounts indicated in the appended table, to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 13 April 2023, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Viktoriya Maradudina Faris Vehabović
Acting Deputy Registrar President

APPENDIX

List of applications raising complaints under Article 11 of the Convention

(restrictions on the location, time or manner of conduct of public events)

Application no. Date of introduction	Applicant’s name Year of birth	Representative’s name and location	Name of the public event Location Date	Administrative charges	Penalty	Final domestic decision	Other complaints under well‑established case-law	Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant (in euros) [1]
70089/12 06/10/2012 and 11801/18 16/02/2018	Svetlana Vladimirovna UVARKINA 1975	Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich Saint-Barthélemy d’Anjou	Protest against the results of 2011 Parliamentary elections Syktyvkar 10/12/2011 Anti-corruption rally Syktyvkar 26/03/2017	Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 500 administrative fine of RUB 10,000	Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 18/07/2013 Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 16/08/2017	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.	3,500
14146/14 31/01/2014 and 17361/19 18/03/2019	Aleksey Nikolayevich ZHITNIKOV 1978	Laptev Aleksey Nikolayevich Moscow	Rally in support of the “March of Millions” Perm 12/06/2013 Rally against the pension reform Perm 09/09/2018	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 10,000 administrative detention of 15 days	Perm Regional Court 01/08/2013 Perm Regional Court 18/09/2018	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 09/09/2018 at 6.40 p.m. the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO; Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the first-instance court was executed immediately on 10/09/2018, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.	5,000
52481/17 08/07/2017 and 74992/17 19/09/2017	Irina Aleksandrovna YATSENKO 1981	Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich Mytishchi	Political rally Moscow 25/08/2016 “Readings of the Russian Constitution” Moscow 12/09/2016 “Readings of the Russian Constitution” Moscow 12/05/2017	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 15,000 administrative fine of RUB 10,000 administrative fine of RUB 15,000	Moscow City Court 16/01/2017 Moscow City Court 24/03/2017 Moscow City Court 26/10/2017	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO (events of 12/09/2016 and 12/05/2017); Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 12/09/2016 and 12/05/2017 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity.	4,000
69791/17 20/09/2017	Raushan Faizovich VALIULLIN 1984	Khrunova Irina Vladimirovna Kazan	Anti-corruption rally Naberezhnye Chelny 26/03/2017	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 10,000	Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan 16/08/2017		3,500
70440/17 07/09/2017	Kirill Dmitriyevich NIKOLENKO 1989 Kirill Valeryevich ISHUTIN 1984	Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius	Anti-corruption rally Vladimir (Mr Nikolenko) 12/06/2017	Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO (Mr Nikolenko)	administrative fine of RUB 25,000 (Mr Nikolenko)	Vladimir Regional Court 02/08/2017 (Mr Nikolenko)	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO in respect of Mr Nikolenko; Art. 11 (1) - restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events - local administration’s refusal to approve the opposition march on 29/04/2017 organised by Mr Nikolenko and Mr Ishutin (final decision Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 22/02/2018).	3,500 (Mr Nikolenko)
70491/17 07/09/2017 and 21716/19 08/04/2019	Dmitriy Aleksandrovich TETERIN 1979	Terekhov Konstantin Ilyich Moscow and Akhtyamova Chulpan Salavatovna Kazan	Anti-corruption rally Naberezhnye Chelny 26/03/2017 Rally against the pension reform Naberezhnye Chelny 09/09/2018	Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 10,000 administrative fine of RUB 10,000	Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan 07/06/2017 Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan 17/10/2018	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO; Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 09/09/2018 and 18/09/2018 the applicant was taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity.	4,000
4522/18 25/12/2017	Maksim Sergeyevich TERESHKIN 1984	Sidelnikova Polina Aleksandrovna Vladivistok	Anti-corruption rally Vladivostok 26/03/2017	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 10,000	Primorye Regional Court 28/06/2017	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.	3,500
4552/18 12/01/2018	Andrey Sergeyevich MELKHOV 1988 Vladimir Valeryevich SOLDATOV 1990	Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich Saint-Barthélemy d’Anjou	Anti-corruption rally Ukhta 26/03/2017	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 5,000	Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 12/07/2017	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 26/03/2017 the applicants were taken to the police station as administrative suspects: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence records (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspects’ identity; detention from 2.25 p.m. to 6.15 p.m. (Mr Melkhov) and from 2.25 p.m. to 7.25 p.m. (Mr Soldatov) with no justification; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.	4,000 (Mr Melkhov) 4,000 (Mr Soldatov)
4847/18 17/01/2018	Anton Borisovich RASIN 1989	Terekhov Konstantin Ilyich Moscow	Anti-corruption rally Vladivostok 12/06/2017	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 10,000	Primorye Regional Court 23/08/2017	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.	3,500
5195/18 17/01/2018	Mariya Igorevna ZINCHENKO 1990	Terekhov Konstantin Ilyich Moscow	Anti-corruption rally Vladivostok 26/03/2017	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 10,000	Primorye Regional Court 02/08/2017	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 26/03/2017 the applicant was taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence records (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.	4,000
5327/18 08/01/2018 and 7933/19 25/01/2019	Vyacheslav Ilyich GIMADI 1985	Terekhov Konstantin Ilyich Moscow and Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius	Anti-corruption rally Moscow 26/03/2017	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 20,000	Moscow City Court 18/08/2017	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO; Art. 11 (1) - restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events - Moscow city administration’s numerous refusals to approve public meetings with A. Navalnyy in Pushkinskaya Square in Moscow between 30/09/2017 and 16/12/2017 (final decisions were given by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on 14/09/2018, 04/10/2018, 05/10/2018, 18/10/2018, 26/10/2018; 23/11/2018 and 12/12/2018).	3,500
7861/18 10/01/2018	Maksim Anatolyevich RAZMETOV 1967		Political march St Petersburg 29/04/2017	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 10,000	St Petersburg City Court 27/06/2017 (copy received on 20/07/2017)	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.	3,500
11830/18 02/03/2018	Radislav Rafailovich FEDOROV 1983	Terekhov Konstantin Ilyich Moscow	Anti-corruption rally Naberezhnye Chelny 26/03/2017	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 10,000	Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan 13/09/2017	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.	3,500
24202/18 08/05/2018	Yuriy Yuryevich VOLOBUYEV 1968	Terekhov Konstantin Ilyich Moscow	Political rally Smolensk 07/10/2017	Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 20,000	Smolensk Regional Court 14/11/2017	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO.	3,500
28408/18 30/05/2018	Maksim Dmitriyevich SOLODNIKOV 1998	Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna Moscow	Political rally Perm 07/10/2017	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	community work of 20 hours	Perm Regional Court 30/11/2017	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.	3,500
30475/18 14/06/2018 and 8274/20 21/01/2020	Mikhail Mikhaylovich SILICH 1938	Yefremova Yekaterina Viktorovna Moscow	Political rally Moscow 08/10/2017 Rally for fair elections to Mosgorduma Moscow 27/07/2019	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 2,000 administrative fine of RUB 5,000	Moscow City Court 16/03/2018 Moscow City Court 24/10/2019	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.	3,500
35074/18 12/07/2018	Irina Alekseyevna ILYINA 1961	Yelanchik Oleg Aleksandrovich Moscow	Political rally Moscow 14/06/2017	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 10,000	Moscow City Court 12/01/2018	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 14/06/2017 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence records (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.	4,000
37025/18 25/07/2018	Konstantin Matveyevich SALTYKOV 1998	Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius	Rally in support of A. Navalnyy “Strike of voters” Moscow 28/01/2018	Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO and Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO	administrative detention of 30 days and administrative detention of 15 days	Moscow City Court 08/02/2018 (two decisions)	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 28/01/2018 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence records (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; detention at the police station from 2.40 p.m. on 28/01/2018 to 1.20 p.m. on 29/01/2018 with no justification; the record of administrative arrest was compiled only eight hours after the applicant’s arrest and escorting to the police station; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO and under Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO.	5,000
41140/18 25/07/2018	Anton Sergeyevich GRACHEV 1980		Political rally Gatchina, Leningrad Region 09/03/2018	Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO	administrative detention of 5 days	Leningrad Regional Court 20/03/2018	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO; Art. 11 (1) - restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events - local administration’s refusal to approve the locations and dates of political rallies on 07/10/2017 and 08/10/2017 (final decision Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 15/08/2018).	5,000
50045/18 10/10/2018	Semen Sergeyevich LASKIN 1990	Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius	Political rally “He is not our tsar” Voronezh 05/05/2018	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 10,000	Voronezh Regional Court 26/06/2018	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO; Art. 11 (1) - restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events - local administration’s refusal to approve the location and date of the political rally “Strike of voters” on 28/01/2018 (final decision by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 25/05/2018).	3,500
50624/18 10/10/2018	Nikita Olegovich RYAZHSKIKH 1999	Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich Vilnius	Political rally “He is not our tsar” Voronezh 05/05/2018	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 10,000	Voronezh Regional Court 04/06/2018	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO; Art. 11 (1) - restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events - local administration’s refusals to approve the locations and dates of four public events planned between 10/11/2017 and 25/11/2017 (final decisions were given by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation 23/07/2018 and 18/09/2018).	3,500
56385/18 17/11/2018	Aleksandra Andreyevna SHINKAREVA 1998	Ivanets Vyacheslav Sergeyevich Tbilisi, Georgia	Political rally “He is not our tsar” Irkutsk 05/05/2018	Article 20.2 § 3 of CAO	community work of 50 hours	Irkutsk Regional Court 18/07/2018	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 3 of CAO.	3,500
11398/19 15/02/2019 and 52155/19 20/09/2019 and 9303/20 31/01/2020 and 30159/20 21/05/2019	Ivan Yuryevich ZHDANOV 1988	Zamyatin Yevgeniy Mikhaylovich Berlin Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich Vilnius Los Vladlen Kornelevich Vilnius	Rally against the pension reform Moscow 09/09/2018 Rally for fair elections to Mosgorduma Moscow 14/07/2019 Rally for fair elections to Mosgorduma Moscow 27/07/2019	Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 250,000 administrative fine of RUB 25,000 administrative detention of 15 days	Moscow City Court 12/04/2019 Moscow City Court 26/02/2020 Moscow City Court 02/08/2019	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 25/10/2018 and 27/07/2019 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence records (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; detention at the police station from 9.25 p.m. on 27/07/2019 to 8.30 p.m. on 29/07/2019 with no justification; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 2, Article 20.2 § 6.1 and Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO; Art. 11 (1) - restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events – Moscow City administration’s refusals to approve the locations and dates of five public meetings with A. Navalnyy planned between 29/09/2017 and 06/11/2017 (final decisions were given by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on 24/08/2018, 27/08/2018, 17/09/2018 and 23/11/2018).	7,000
18503/19 21/03/2019	Timur Kamalutdinovich RASULOV 1998	Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich St Petersburg	“Disappearing Constitution” protest St Petersburg 10/10/2018	Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO	community work of 100 hours	St Petersburg City Court 29/01/2019	Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO.	3,500
22911/19 10/04/2019	Illarion Yevgenyevich LITVINOV 1994	Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich Vladivostok	Rally against the pension reform Vladivostok 01/07/2018	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 10,000	Primorye Regional Court 24/12/2018	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 28/07/2018 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence records (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.	4,000
22914/19 10/04/2019	Tatyana Yuryevna KHARDINA 2000	Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich Vladivostok	Rally against the pension reform Vladivostok 01/07/2018 Rally against the pension reform Vladivostok 09/09/2018 Rally against the pension reform Vladivostok 15/09/2018	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 10,000 administrative fine of RUB 10,000 administrative fine of RUB 5,000	Primorye Regional Court 27/11/2018 Primorye Regional Court 09/01/2019 Primorye Regional Court 15/11/2018	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 04/07/2018 at 1.50 p.m. and on 15/09/2018 at 2.10 p.m. the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence records (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; detention in the police station from 3 p.m. on 15/09/2018 to 2.10 p.m. on 17/09/2018 with no justification; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.	5,000
6929/20 14/01/2020	Ivan Mikhaylovich ZVYAGIN 1992	Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich Sochi	“Monstration” public event Kursk 01/05/2019	Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 10,000	Kursk Regional Court 13/08/2019		3,500
6955/20 14/01/2020	Sergey Vladimirovich BAZHENOV 1969	Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich Sochi	“Monstration” public event Kursk 01/05/2019	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 10,000	Kursk Regional Court 20/08/2019		3,500
6957/20 14/01/2020	Nadezhda Igorevna KOLYCHEVA 1991	Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich Sochi	“Monstration” public event Kursk 01/05/2019	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 10,000	Kursk Regional Court 27/08/2019		3,500
6962/20 14/01/2020	Yelena Vladimirovna VETROVA 1972	Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich Sochi	“Monstration” public event Kursk 01/05/2019	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 10,000	Kursk Regional Court 13/08/2019		3,500
38358/20 22/07/2020	Petr Ivanovich KIKILYK 1944	Ruchko Irina Yuryevna Yekaterinburg	Political rally Degtyarsk, Sverdlovsk Region 13/07/2019	Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 20,000	Sverdlovsk Regional Court 23/10/2019	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 13/07/2019 the applicant was taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence records (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; detention from 3.30 p.m. on 13/07/2019 to 11.45 a.m. on 14/07/2019 with no justification; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO.	4,000
38452/20 18/06/2020	Matvey Alekseyevich ALEKSANDROV 2000	Eysmont Mariya Olegovna Moscow	Political rally Moscow 13/10/2019	Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO	administrative fine of RUB 10,000	Moscow City Court 18/12/2019	Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 13/10/2019 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence records (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.	4,000

No.

Application no.

Date of introduction

Applicant’s name

Year of birth

Representative’s name and location

Name of the public event

Location

Date

Administrative charges

Penalty

Final domestic decision

Other complaints under well‑established case-law

Amount awarded for pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses per applicant

(in euros) [1]

70089/12

06/10/2012

and

11801/18

16/02/2018

Svetlana Vladimirovna UVARKINA

1975

Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich

Saint-Barthélemy d’Anjou

Protest against the results of 2011 Parliamentary elections

Syktyvkar

10/12/2011

Anti-corruption rally

Syktyvkar

26/03/2017

Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 500

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

Supreme Court of the Komi Republic

18/07/2013

Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 16/08/2017

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative‑offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.

3,500

14146/14

31/01/2014

and

17361/19

18/03/2019

Aleksey Nikolayevich ZHITNIKOV

1978

Laptev Aleksey Nikolayevich

Moscow

Rally in support of the “March of Millions”

Perm

12/06/2013

Rally against the pension reform

Perm

09/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

administrative detention of 15 days

Perm Regional Court

01/08/2013

Perm Regional Court

18/09/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 09/09/2018 at 6.40 p.m. the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO;

Prot. 7 Art. 2 - delayed review of conviction by a higher tribunal - the sentence of administrative detention imposed on the applicant by the first-instance court was executed immediately on 10/09/2018, on account of the lack of suspensive effect of an appeal under the CAO.

5,000

52481/17

08/07/2017

and

74992/17

19/09/2017

Irina Aleksandrovna YATSENKO

1981

Zboroshenko Nikolay Sergeyevich

Mytishchi

Political rally

Moscow

25/08/2016

“Readings of the Russian Constitution” Moscow

12/09/2016

“Readings of the Russian Constitution” Moscow

12/05/2017

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 15,000

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

administrative fine of RUB 15,000

Moscow City Court 16/01/2017

Moscow City Court 24/03/2017

Moscow City Court 26/10/2017

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO (events of 12/09/2016 and 12/05/2017);

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 12/09/2016 and 12/05/2017 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity.

4,000

69791/17

20/09/2017

Raushan Faizovich VALIULLIN

1984

Khrunova Irina Vladimirovna

Kazan

Anti-corruption rally

Naberezhnye Chelny

26/03/2017

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan

16/08/2017

3,500

70440/17

07/09/2017

Kirill Dmitriyevich NIKOLENKO

1989

Kirill Valeryevich ISHUTIN

1984

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Anti-corruption rally

Vladimir

(Mr Nikolenko)

12/06/2017

Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

(Mr Nikolenko)

administrative fine of RUB 25,000

(Mr Nikolenko)

Vladimir Regional Court

02/08/2017

(Mr Nikolenko)

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO in respect of Mr Nikolenko;

Art. 11 (1) - restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events - local administration’s refusal to approve the opposition march on 29/04/2017 organised by Mr Nikolenko and Mr Ishutin (final decision Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 22/02/2018).

3,500

(Mr Nikolenko)

70491/17

07/09/2017

and

21716/19

08/04/2019

Dmitriy Aleksandrovich TETERIN

1979

Terekhov Konstantin Ilyich

Moscow

and

Akhtyamova Chulpan Salavatovna

Kazan

Anti-corruption rally

Naberezhnye Chelny

26/03/2017

Rally against the pension reform Naberezhnye Chelny

09/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan

07/06/2017

Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan

17/10/2018

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO;

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 09/09/2018 and 18/09/2018 the applicant was taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence record (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity.

4,000

4522/18

25/12/2017

Maksim Sergeyevich TERESHKIN

1984

Sidelnikova Polina Aleksandrovna

Vladivistok

Anti-corruption rally

Vladivostok

26/03/2017

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

Primorye Regional Court

28/06/2017

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.

3,500

4552/18

12/01/2018

Andrey Sergeyevich MELKHOV

1988

Vladimir Valeryevich SOLDATOV

1990

Mezak Ernest Aleksandrovich

Saint-Barthélemy d’Anjou

Anti-corruption rally

Ukhta

26/03/2017

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 5,000

Supreme Court of the Komi Republic 12/07/2017

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 26/03/2017 the applicants were taken to the police station as administrative suspects: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence records (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspects’ identity; detention from 2.25 p.m. to 6.15 p.m. (Mr Melkhov) and from 2.25 p.m. to 7.25 p.m. (Mr Soldatov) with no justification;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.

4,000

(Mr Melkhov)

4,000

(Mr Soldatov)

4847/18

17/01/2018

Anton Borisovich RASIN

1989

Terekhov Konstantin Ilyich

Moscow

Anti-corruption rally

Vladivostok

12/06/2017

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

Primorye Regional Court

23/08/2017

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.

3,500

5195/18

17/01/2018

Mariya Igorevna ZINCHENKO

1990

Terekhov Konstantin Ilyich

Moscow

Anti-corruption rally

Vladivostok

26/03/2017

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

Primorye Regional Court

02/08/2017

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 26/03/2017 the applicant was taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence records (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.

4,000

5327/18

08/01/2018

and

7933/19

25/01/2019

Vyacheslav Ilyich GIMADI

1985

Terekhov Konstantin Ilyich

Moscow

and

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Anti-corruption rally

Moscow

26/03/2017

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 20,000

Moscow City Court

18/08/2017

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO;

Art. 11 (1) - restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events - Moscow city administration’s numerous refusals to approve public meetings with A. Navalnyy in Pushkinskaya Square in Moscow between 30/09/2017 and 16/12/2017 (final decisions were given by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on 14/09/2018, 04/10/2018, 05/10/2018, 18/10/2018, 26/10/2018; 23/11/2018 and 12/12/2018).

3,500

7861/18

10/01/2018

Maksim Anatolyevich RAZMETOV

1967

Political march

St Petersburg

29/04/2017

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

St Petersburg City Court

27/06/2017

(copy received on 20/07/2017)

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.

3,500

11830/18

02/03/2018

Radislav Rafailovich FEDOROV

1983

Terekhov Konstantin Ilyich

Moscow

Anti-corruption rally

Naberezhnye Chelny

26/03/2017

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

Supreme Court of the Republic of Tatarstan 13/09/2017

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.

3,500

24202/18

08/05/2018

Yuriy Yuryevich VOLOBUYEV

1968

Terekhov Konstantin Ilyich

Moscow

Political rally

Smolensk

07/10/2017

Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 20,000

Smolensk Regional Court

14/11/2017

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO.

3,500

28408/18

30/05/2018

Maksim Dmitriyevich SOLODNIKOV

1998

Pershakova Yelena Yuryevna

Moscow

Political rally

Perm

07/10/2017

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

community work of 20 hours

Perm Regional Court

30/11/2017

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.

3,500

30475/18

14/06/2018

and

8274/20

21/01/2020

Mikhail Mikhaylovich SILICH

1938

Yefremova Yekaterina Viktorovna

Moscow

Political rally

Moscow

08/10/2017

Rally for fair elections to Mosgorduma

Moscow

27/07/2019

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 2,000

administrative fine of RUB 5,000

Moscow City Court

16/03/2018

Moscow City Court 24/10/2019

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.

3,500

35074/18

12/07/2018

Irina Alekseyevna ILYINA

1961

Yelanchik Oleg Aleksandrovich

Moscow

Political rally

Moscow

14/06/2017

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

12/01/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 14/06/2017 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence records (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.

4,000

37025/18

25/07/2018

Konstantin Matveyevich SALTYKOV

1998

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Rally in support of A. Navalnyy “Strike of voters”

Moscow

28/01/2018

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

and

Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO

administrative detention of 30 days

and

administrative detention of 15 days

Moscow City Court

08/02/2018 (two decisions)

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 28/01/2018 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence records (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; detention at the police station from 2.40 p.m. on 28/01/2018 to 1.20 p.m. on 29/01/2018 with no justification; the record of administrative arrest was compiled only eight hours after the applicant’s arrest and escorting to the police station;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in both sets of administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO and under Article 19.3 § 1 of CAO.

5,000

41140/18

25/07/2018

Anton Sergeyevich GRACHEV

1980

Political rally

Gatchina, Leningrad Region

09/03/2018

Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

administrative detention of 5 days

Leningrad Regional Court

20/03/2018

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO;

Art. 11 (1) - restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events - local administration’s refusal to approve the locations and dates of political rallies on 07/10/2017 and 08/10/2017 (final decision Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 15/08/2018).

5,000

50045/18

10/10/2018

Semen Sergeyevich LASKIN

1990

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Political rally “He is not our tsar”

Voronezh

05/05/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

Voronezh Regional Court

26/06/2018

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO;

Art. 11 (1) - restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events - local administration’s refusal to approve the location and date of the political rally “Strike of voters” on 28/01/2018 (final decision by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, 25/05/2018).

3,500

50624/18

10/10/2018

Nikita Olegovich RYAZHSKIKH

1999

Zhdanov Ivan Yuryevich

Vilnius

Political rally “He is not our tsar”

Voronezh

05/05/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

Voronezh Regional Court

04/06/2018

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO;

Art. 11 (1) - restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events - local administration’s refusals to approve the locations and dates of four public events planned between 10/11/2017 and 25/11/2017 (final decisions were given by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation

23/07/2018 and 18/09/2018).

3,500

56385/18

17/11/2018

Aleksandra Andreyevna SHINKAREVA

1998

Ivanets Vyacheslav Sergeyevich

Tbilisi, Georgia

Political rally “He is not our tsar”

Irkutsk

05/05/2018

Article 20.2 § 3 of CAO

community work of 50 hours

Irkutsk Regional Court

18/07/2018

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 3 of CAO.

3,500

11398/19

15/02/2019

and

52155/19

20/09/2019

and

9303/20

31/01/2020

and

30159/20

21/05/2019

Ivan Yuryevich ZHDANOV

1988

Zamyatin Yevgeniy Mikhaylovich

Berlin

Pomazuyev Aleksandr Yevgenyevich

Vilnius

Los Vladlen Kornelevich

Vilnius

Rally against the pension reform

Moscow

09/09/2018

Rally for fair elections to Mosgorduma

Moscow

14/07/2019

Rally for fair elections to Mosgorduma

Moscow

27/07/2019

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

Article 20.2 § 6.1 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 250,000

administrative fine of RUB 25,000

administrative detention of 15 days

Moscow City Court

12/04/2019

Moscow City Court 26/02/2020

Moscow City Court

02/08/2019

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 25/10/2018 and 27/07/2019 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence records (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; detention at the police station from 9.25 p.m. on 27/07/2019 to 8.30 p.m. on 29/07/2019 with no justification;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 2, Article 20.2 § 6.1 and Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO;

Art. 11 (1) - restrictions on location, time or manner of conduct of public events –

Moscow City administration’s refusals to approve the locations and dates of five public meetings with A. Navalnyy planned between 29/09/2017 and 06/11/2017 (final decisions were given by the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on 24/08/2018, 27/08/2018, 17/09/2018 and 23/11/2018).

7,000

18503/19

21/03/2019

Timur Kamalutdinovich RASULOV

1998

Peredruk Aleksandr Dmitriyevich

St Petersburg

“Disappearing Constitution” protest

St Petersburg

10/10/2018

Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO

community work of 100 hours

St Petersburg City Court

29/01/2019

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 8 of CAO.

3,500

22911/19

10/04/2019

Illarion Yevgenyevich LITVINOV

1994

Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich

Vladivostok

Rally against the pension reform

Vladivostok

01/07/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

Primorye Regional Court

24/12/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 28/07/2018 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence records (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.

4,000

22914/19

10/04/2019

Tatyana Yuryevna KHARDINA

2000

Zubarev Dmitriy Vladimirovich

Vladivostok

Rally against the pension reform

Vladivostok

01/07/2018

Rally against the pension reform

Vladivostok

09/09/2018

Rally against the pension reform

Vladivostok

15/09/2018

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

administrative fine of RUB 5,000

Primorye Regional Court

27/11/2018

Primorye Regional Court

09/01/2019

Primorye Regional Court

15/11/2018

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 04/07/2018 at 1.50 p.m. and on 15/09/2018 at 2.10 p.m. the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence records (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; detention in the police station from 3 p.m. on 15/09/2018 to 2.10 p.m. on 17/09/2018 with no justification;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in all sets of administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.

5,000

6929/20

14/01/2020

Ivan Mikhaylovich ZVYAGIN

1992

Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich

Sochi

“Monstration” public event

Kursk

01/05/2019

Article 20.2 § 1 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

Kursk Regional Court

13/08/2019

3,500

6955/20

14/01/2020

Sergey Vladimirovich BAZHENOV

1969

Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich

Sochi

“Monstration” public event

Kursk

01/05/2019

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

Kursk Regional Court

20/08/2019

3,500

6957/20

14/01/2020

Nadezhda Igorevna KOLYCHEVA

1991

Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich

Sochi

“Monstration” public event

Kursk

01/05/2019

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

Kursk Regional Court

27/08/2019

3,500

6962/20

14/01/2020

Yelena Vladimirovna VETROVA

1972

Popkov Aleksandr Vasilyevich

Sochi

“Monstration” public event

Kursk

01/05/2019

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

Kursk Regional Court

13/08/2019

3,500

38358/20

22/07/2020

Petr Ivanovich KIKILYK

1944

Ruchko Irina Yuryevna

Yekaterinburg

Political rally

Degtyarsk, Sverdlovsk Region

13/07/2019

Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 20,000

Sverdlovsk Regional Court

23/10/2019

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 13/07/2019 the applicant was taken to the police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence records (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity; detention from 3.30 p.m. on 13/07/2019 to 11.45 a.m. on 14/07/2019 with no justification;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 2 of CAO.

4,000

38452/20

18/06/2020

Matvey Alekseyevich ALEKSANDROV

2000

Eysmont Mariya Olegovna

Moscow

Political rally

Moscow

13/10/2019

Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO

administrative fine of RUB 10,000

Moscow City Court

18/12/2019

Art. 5 (1) - unlawful deprivation of liberty, including unrecorded detention and detention without a judicial order and any other legal basis - on 13/10/2019 the applicant was taken to a police station as an administrative suspect: no evidence/assessment that it was impracticable, on the spot, to compile the offence records (Art. 27.2 § 1 of CAO) and achieve the objectives set out in Art. 27.1 of CAO, e.g. to establish the suspect’s identity;

Art. 6 (1) - lack of impartiality of the tribunal in view of the absence of a prosecuting party in administrative-offence proceedings under Article 20.2 § 5 of CAO.

4,000

[1] Plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants.

About BAILII - FAQ - Copyright Policy - Disclaimers - Privacy Policy amended on 25/11/2010