European Court of Human Rights

 

 

 

SECOND SECTION

CASE OF BAYRAM AND OTHERS v. TÜRKİYE

(Applications nos. 20061/17 and 107 others)

 

 

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG

6 September 2022

 

 

 

 

This judgment is final but it may be subject to editorial revision.

 

In the case of Bayram and Others v. Türkiye,

The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

          Pauliine Koskelo, President,

          Gilberto Felici,

          Saadet Yüksel, judges,
and Hasan Bakırcı, Section Registrar,

Having regard to:

the applications against the Republic of Türkiye lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by one hundred and nine Turkish nationals, whose relevant details are listed in the appended table (“the applicants”), on the various dates indicated therein;

the decision to give notice of the applications to the Turkish Government (“the Government”) represented by their Agent, Mr Hacı Ali Açıkgül, Head of the Department of Human Rights of the Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Türkiye;

the parties’ observations;

the decision to reject the Government’s objection to the examination of the applications by a Committee;

 

Having deliberated in private on 28 June 2022,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

SUBJECT MATTER OF THE CASE

1.  The present applications mainly concern the arrest and pre-trial detention of the applicants in the aftermath of the coup attempt of 15 July 2016, on suspicion of their membership of an organisation described by the Turkish authorities as the “Fetullahist Terrorist Organisation / Parallel State Structure” (Fetullahçı Terör Örgütü / Paralel Devlet Yapılanması, hereinafter referred to as “FETÖ/PDY”), which was considered by the authorities to be behind the coup attempt (further information regarding the events that unfolded after the coup attempt, including the details of the state of emergency declared by the respondent Government and the ensuing notice of derogation given to the Secretary General of the Council of Europe, as well as the legislative developments that followed the declaration of the state of emergency, may be found in the case of Baş v. Turkey, no. 66448/17, §§ 7‑14 and §§ 109-110, 3 March 2020). All of the applicants were serving as judges or prosecutors at different types and/or levels of court at the material time.

2.  On 16 July 2016 the Ankara chief public prosecutor’s office initiated a criminal investigation into, inter alios, the suspected members of FETÖ/PDY within the judiciary, including members of high courts, in accordance with the provisions of the ordinary law, on the ground that there had been a case of discovery in flagrante delicto falling within the jurisdiction of the assize courts (further information regarding the orders issued by the chief public prosecutor’s office within the context of that investigation, as well as the ensuing suspensions and dismissals of judges and prosecutors suspected of being members of FETÖ/PDY, may be found in Baş, cited above, §§ 9-10 and 15-21).

3.  Following their arrest and detention in police custody on the orders of the regional and provincial prosecutors’ offices, the applicants were placed in pre-trial detention on various dates, mainly on suspicion of membership of the FETÖ/PDY organisation, an offence punishable under Article 314 of the Criminal Code (see Baş, cited above, § 58). The pre-trial detention decisions were issued by the magistrates’ courts located at the respective places of the applicants’ arrest. In the majority of the decisions, it was noted specifically that the criminal investigation was governed by the ordinary rules, given that the offence of which the suspects were accused, namely membership of an armed terrorist organisation, was a “continuing offence” and that there was a case of discovery in flagrante delicto governed by the relevant provisions of domestic law (see Baş, cited above, § 67, and Turan and Others v. Turkey, nos. 75805/16 and 426 others, §§ 30-31, 23 November 2021)

4.  According to the latest information provided by the parties, most of the applicants were convicted of membership of a terrorist organisation by the first instance courts, and some were acquitted. It appears that, for the most part, the appeal proceedings are still pending.

5.  In the meantime, the applicants lodged individual applications with the Constitutional Court in respect of, inter alia, the alleged violation of their right to liberty and security on various accounts, including the alleged unlawfulness of their detention by reason of the disregard of the procedural safeguards afforded to members of the judiciary in domestic law, all of which were declared inadmissible (see Turan and Others, cited above, §§ 26‑27).

THE COURT’S ASSESSMENT

I.        JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS

6.  Having regard to the similar subject matter of the applications, the Court finds it appropriate to examine them jointly in a single judgment.

II.     ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 5 § 1 OF THE CONVENTION

7.  The applicants complained that they had been placed in pre-trial detention in breach of the domestic laws governing the arrest and pre-trial detention of the members of the judiciary and disputed that there had been a case of discovery in flagrante delicto for the purposes of section 94 of Law no. 2802 on judges and prosecutors and section 46 of the Court of Cassation Act (Law no. 2797).

8.  The Government invited the Court to declare this complaint inadmissible for the reasons that they had raised in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, § 55). The Court notes that the Government’s objections have already been dismissed in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, §§ 57‑64) and sees no reason to depart from those findings in the present case. The Court therefore considers that this complaint is not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention or inadmissible on any other grounds. It must therefore be declared admissible.

9.  The Court further considers, having regard to its findings in the cases of Baş and Turan and Others (both cited above, §§ 143-158 and §§ 79‑96, respectively), that the pre-trial detention of the applicants had not taken place in accordance with a procedure prescribed by law within the meaning of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention and that, therefore, there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 on account of the unlawfulness of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention. Moreover, while the applicants were detained a short time after the coup attempt - that is, the event that prompted the declaration of the state of emergency and the notice of derogation by Türkiye –, which is undoubtedly a contextual factor that should be fully taken into account in interpreting and applying Article 5 of the Convention in the present case, the measure at issue cannot be said to have been strictly required by the exigencies of the situation (see Baş, cited above, §§ 115-116 and §§ 159‑162, and Turan and Others, cited above, § 91 and 95).

III.   OTHER COMPLAINTS

A.    Alleged violation of Article 6 (non-communication of the public prosecutor’s opinion) and Article 8 (registration of letters)

10.  Applicant in application no. 53285/19 complained under Article 6 of the Convention of the non-communication of the public prosecutor’s written opinion during the proceedings before the Bakırköy Assize Court, where he had contested some restrictions imposed by the prison authorities. Furthermore, the applicant in application no. 47398/19 complained under Article 8 that the letters he sent from the prison were being registered on the National Judicial Network Server (UYAP).

11.  The Court has examined these complaints and considers that, in the light of all the material in its possession and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, they do not meet the admissibility criteria set out in Articles 34 and 35 of the Convention (see, for instance, Uzun v. Turkey (dec.), no. 10755/13, §§ 33-71, 30 April 2013, and Günana and Others v. Turkey, nos. 70934/10 and 4 others, § 79, 20 November 2018).

12.  It follows that this part of the applications must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 § 4 of the Convention.

B.    Remaining complaints

13.  As regards any remaining complaints under Article 5 §§ 1, 3, 4, 5 and Article 8 of the Convention, the Court decides not to examine them, in view of its findings under Article 5 § 1 above and its considerations in the case of Turan and Others (cited above, § 98).

APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

14.  The applicants requested compensation in varying amounts in respect of non-pecuniary damage. Most of the applicants also claimed pecuniary damage, corresponding mainly to their loss of earnings resulting from their dismissal, as well as the legal costs and expenses incurred before the domestic courts and the Court.

15.  The Government contested the applicants’ claims as being unsubstantiated and excessive.

16.  For the reasons put forth in Turan and Others (cited above, §§ 102‑107), the Court rejects any claims for pecuniary damage and awards each of the applicants a lump sum of 5,000 euros (EUR), covering non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on that amount.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT, UNANIMOUSLY,

1.      Decides to join the applications;

2.      Declares the complaint under Article 5 § 1 of the Convention concerning the lawfulness of the applicants’ initial pre-trial detention admissible;

3.      Holds that there has been a violation of Article 5 § 1 of the Convention on account of the unlawfulness of the initial pre-trial detention of the applicants;

4.      Declares the complaint under Article 6 of the Convention regarding the non-communication of the public prosecutor’s opinion (application no. 53285/19) and the complaint under Article 8 concerning the registration of letters sent from prison (application no. 47398/19) inadmissible;

5.      Holds that there is no need to examine the admissibility and merits of the applicants’ remaining complaints under Articles 5 and 8 of the Convention;

6.      Holds

(a)   that the respondent State is to pay each of the applicants, within three months, EUR 5,000 (five thousand euros) in respect of non-pecuniary damage and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable on these amounts, which are to be converted into the currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;

7.      Dismisses the remainder of the applicants’ claim for just satisfaction.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 6 September 2022, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

                       

             Hasan Bakırcı                                                  Pauliine Koskelo
                 Registrar                                                             President

 

 

APPENDIX

List of cases :

 

No.	Application no.	Case name	Lodged on	Applicant Date of Birth	Represented by	Applicant’s status at the time of pre-trial detention
1.	20061/17	Bayram v. Türkiye	23/02/2017	Mehmet BAYRAM 08/05/1975	Kadri İNCE	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
2.	27433/17	Yaz v. Türkiye	27/02/2017	Burhan YAZ 17/03/1968	Elif EKİCİ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
3.	36899/17	Yalçın v. Türkiye	16/01/2017	Ali YALÇIN 01/06/1975	Cengiz ÇITAK	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
4.	40719/17	Türkyılmaz v. Türkiye	27/03/2017	Muhammed TÜRKYILMAZ 04/03/1988	Mustafa YILDIZ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
5.	41664/17	Karaarslan v. Türkiye	27/04/2017	Yavuz KARAARSLAN 13/02/1972	Tuğba ÜSTÜNEL ÖZKAN	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
6.	41879/17	Kopal v. Türkiye	17/04/2017	Murat KOPAL 21/01/1981		Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
7.	45028/17	Erşen v. Türkiye	26/05/2017	Serkan ERŞEN 24/07/1980	Gökçehan SAĞLAM	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
8.	46942/17	Uğurlu v. Türkiye	15/03/2017	Mehmet UĞURLU 31/07/1976	Mehmet ARI	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
9.	58972/17	Alanur v. Türkiye	20/04/2017	Hakkı Hakan ALANUR 12/11/1968	Şakir HEPİYİLER	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
10.	61242/17	Beydili v. Türkiye	16/06/2017	Mustafa BEYDİLİ 03/03/1988	İmdat BERKSOY	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
11.	61647/17	Turgut v. Türkiye	30/05/2017	Salih TURGUT 10/05/1983	Süleyman DOĞRUER	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
12.	61652/17	Varol v. Türkiye	25/04/2017	Muhammet VAROL 02/05/1979	İlyas TEKİN	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
13.	61970/17	Demircan v. Türkiye	26/04/2017	Mustafa DEMİRCAN 24/08/1976	Yasemin DEMİRCAN	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
14.	62720/17	Pınar v. Türkiye	28/04/2017	Mehmet Erkan PINAR 01/01/1969		Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
15.	62773/17	Gürses v. Türkiye	28/04/2017	Uğur GÜRSES 25/01/1987	Ebubekir RENK	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
16.	62774/17	Arkuntaş v. Türkiye	10/02/2017	Mesut ARKUNTAŞ 31/08/1973	Sefanur BOZGÖZ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
17.	63579/17	Toprak v. Türkiye	25/05/2017	Ahmet TOPRAK 21/12/1990	Önder ÖZDERYOL	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
18.	63582/17	Şahin v. Türkiye	10/05/2017	Adil ŞAHİN 12/07/1985	Kamile KILDAN	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
19.	63622/17	Aburşu v. Türkiye	28/03/2017	Serdar ABURŞU 20/08/1982	Tufan YILMAZ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
20.	63712/17	Şişaneci v. Türkiye	20/04/2017	Mustafa ŞİŞANECİ 15/05/1983		Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
21.	63740/17	Köse v. Türkiye	13/06/2017	Ahmet KÖSE 27/03/1982		Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
22.	63784/17	Akkan v. Türkiye	29/05/2017	Bahattin AKKAN 10/09/1977	Fatih DÖNMEZ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
23.	66359/17	Altun v. Türkiye	26/01/2017	Recep ALTUN 16/07/1976	Mehmet ÖNCÜ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
24.	66371/17	Soyal v. Türkiye	18/05/2017	Metin SOYAL 01/01/1973	Ahmet Can DEMİRCİ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
25.	70544/17	Tarhan v. Türkiye	27/07/2017	Kadir TARHAN 05/04/1982	Fatih DÖNMEZ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
26.	70628/17	Özdemir v. Türkiye	21/08/2017	Hasan ÖZDEMİR 01/01/1984	Ahmet Can DEMİRCİ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
27.	70857/17	Güneş v. Türkiye	08/08/2017	Cuma GÜNEŞ 17/01/1986	Özge ALTINTOP	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
28.	73516/17	Çelebi v. Türkiye	05/09/2017	Bülent ÇELEBİ 04/04/1974	Regaip DEMİR	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
29.	82865/17	Ülkü v. Türkiye	03/11/2017	Musa ÜLKÜ 30/11/1972		Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
30.	6613/18	Kayaalp v. Türkiye	16/01/2018	Selahattin KAYAALP 15/02/1987	Demet YÜREKLİ KAYAALP	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
31.	14769/18	Yalçınöz v. Türkiye	25/07/2018	Bahadır YALÇINÖZ 19/02/1980	Barış ANTÜRK	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
32.	17830/18	Aras v. Türkiye	04/04/2018	Bahattin ARAS 15/11/1977		Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
33.	20047/18	Karaosmanoğlu v. Türkiye	06/03/2018	Mustafa KARAOSMANOĞLU 15/08/1980	Şerafettin AKTAŞ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
34.	27587/18	Memiş v. Türkiye	22/05/2018	Yusuf MEMİŞ 01/06/1966	Esad MEMİŞ	Member of Court of Cassation
35.	40298/18	Duran v. Türkiye	16/08/2018	Eyüp Murat DURAN 04/02/1977	Ali DURGUN	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
36.	52619/18	Gedikli v. Türkiye	26/10/2018	Halük GEDİKLİ 01/02/1969	İrem TATLIDEDE	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
37.	54227/18	Kaya v. Türkiye	12/10/2018	İlhan KAYA 03/08/1965	Yakup GÖNEN	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
38.	11804/19	Şanal v. Türkiye	22/02/2019	Osman ŞANAL 10/03/1972	Ali ALAGÖZ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
39.	13253/19	Çakın v. Türkiye	26/02/2019	Akın ÇAKIN 11/07/1967	Ahmet Kerem ÇAKIN	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
40.	20941/19	Gülbaş v. Türkiye	05/04/2019	Abdullah GÜLBAŞ 03/10/1983	Halil İbrahim GÜLBAŞ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
41.	23663/19	Navruz v. Türkiye	22/04/2019	Yakup NAVRUZ 05/01/1981	Kamile KILDAN	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
42.	24746/19	Ertürk v. Türkiye	29/04/2019	Mustafa Celal ERTÜRK 11/02/1968	Oğuz Emre ERTÜRK	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
43.	27944/19	Karabacak v. Türkiye	03/05/2019	Engin KARABACAK 23/12/1980	Ömer Faruk ERGÜN	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
44.	28219/19	Evğün v. Türkiye	08/05/2019	Saniye EVĞÜN 25/01/1984	Emre AKARYILDIZ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
45.	28260/19	Aydın v. Türkiye	03/05/2019	Sami AYDIN 08/01/1973	Ahmet OKU	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
46.	30433/19	Saatçıoğlu v. Türkiye	20/05/2019	Fuat SAATÇIOĞLU 08/03/1984	Fatma Vildan YİRMİBEŞOĞLU	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
47.	30652/19	Kurmaz v. Türkiye	16/05/2019	Harun KURMAZ 01/10/1981	Hatice YILDIZ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
48.	31483/19	Karpuz v. Türkiye	21/05/2019	İbrahim KARPUZ 30/03/1973	Ayşe DURMUŞ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
49.	31513/19	Temiz v. Türkiye	31/05/2019	Ömer TEMİZ 14/08/1980		Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
50.	32201/19	Sarıkaya v. Türkiye	29/05/2019	Mustafa SARIKAYA 03/01/1987		Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
51.	33924/19	Şahin v. Türkiye	14/06/2019	Mehmet ŞAHİN 03/12/1980	Nurcan BAL	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
52.	34034/19	Akıllı v. Türkiye	11/06/2019	İlhan AKILLI 23/04/1980	Mustafa SOYLU	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
53.	34060/19	Sarı v. Türkiye	17/06/2019	Halil SARI 26/03/1990		Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
54.	36029/19	Çelik v. Türkiye	25/06/2019	Hasan ÇELİK 01/10/1984	Ebubekir ÇELİK	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
55.	36037/19	Bekar v. Türkiye	24/06/2019	Mustafa BEKAR 18/09/1984	Ebubekir RENK	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
56.	36331/19	Aydın v. Türkiye	18/06/2019	Fatma Serpil AYDIN 22/07/1988	Mehmet Fatih İÇER	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
57.	36334/19	Şahin v. Türkiye	19/06/2019	İlyas ŞAHİN 01/01/1976	Fatih DÖNMEZ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
58.	36454/19	Karakaya v. Türkiye	26/06/2019	Mustafa KARAKAYA 12/03/1981		Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
59.	36535/19	Tatar v. Türkiye	18/06/2019	Sinan TATAR 01/07/1989	Hanifi BAYRI	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
60.	36918/19	Kılıçaslan v. Türkiye	03/07/2019	Osman KILIÇASLAN 09/10/1978	Enes Malik KILIÇ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
61.	36941/19	Kara v. Türkiye	03/07/2019	Enis KARA 01/09/1981	Murat ÇAKAL	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
62.	36957/19	Alkan v. Türkiye	03/07/2019	Ömer Faruk ALKAN 08/05/1990	Rabia ALKAN	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
63.	37541/19	Cebre v. Türkiye	30/05/2019	Ayvaz CEBRE 30/07/1984	Ceren ATALAY	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
64.	38913/19	Akdoğan v. Türkiye	09/07/2019	Şerife AKDOĞAN 09/03/1989	Murat GÜNDEM	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
65.	40674/19	Zengin v. Türkiye	20/07/2019	Ali Osman ZENGİN 26/04/1971		Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
66.	41521/19	Serli v. Türkiye	08/07/2019	Ufuk SERLİ 08/05/1985	Sultan TEKE SOYDİNÇ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
67.	44303/19	Çekiç v. Türkiye	09/08/2019	Mahmut ÇEKİÇ 23/10/1970	Ömer NAZLIM	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
68.	44341/19	Polat v. Türkiye	05/08/2019	İsmail POLAT 15/01/1974	İlyas TEKİN	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
69.	44464/19	Dönmez v. Türkiye	08/08/2019	Celalettin DÖNMEZ 15/12/1972	Fatih DÖNMEZ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
70.	44529/19	Sağlam v. Türkiye	06/08/2019	Harun SAĞLAM 15/06/1979	Gizay DULKADİR	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
71.	46185/19	Kuzgun v. Türkiye	20/08/2019	Ersan KUZGUN 13/11/1984	Cebrail Eren KAYNAR	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
72.	46758/19	Aykaç v. Türkiye	26/08/2019	Fatih AYKAÇ 01/02/1975	Menekşe Merve TEKTEN	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
73.	47398/19	Yetim v. Türkiye	24/08/2019	Servet YETİM 08/09/1971	İzettin DEMİR	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
74.	47483/19	Kurt v. Türkiye	15/08/2019	Sami KURT 18/02/1978		Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
75.	50697/19	Ünlü v. Türkiye	28/08/2019	Erhan ÜNLÜ 01/09/1967		Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
76.	50704/19	Demirci v. Türkiye	04/09/2019	Osman DEMİRCİ 04/08/1972	Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
77.	51002/19	Takımsu v. Türkiye	27/08/2019	Mehmet TAKIMSU 01/11/1983	Kamile KILDAN	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
78.	51180/19	Demirtaş v. Türkiye	23/08/2019	Murat DEMİRTAŞ 15/10/1988	Hanifi BAYRI	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
79.	51768/19	Kızılyel v. Türkiye	03/09/2019	Serkan KIZILYEL 10/02/1979	Fatih Mehmet ADANIR	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
80.	51798/19	Müftüoğlu v. Türkiye	10/09/2019	Kamil MÜFTÜOĞLU 10/08/1983	Cemal GELİNCİK	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
81.	52458/19	Öztürk v. Türkiye	25/09/2019	Özcan ÖZTÜRK 16/02/1982	Tolga Kaan PATAZ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
82.	52774/19	Öztürk v. Türkiye	23/09/2019	Hakan ÖZTÜRK 20/03/1983	Emre AKARYILDIZ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
83.	52792/19	Küçükkaya v. Türkiye	10/09/2019	Mukadder KÜÇÜKKAYA 26/02/1978	Mehmet MİRZA	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
84.	53000/19	Karabidek v. Türkiye	27/09/2019	Mehmet KARABİDEK 01/05/1971	İrem TATLIDEDE	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
85.	53078/19	Karaca v. Türkiye	02/10/2019	Yalçın KARACA 01/01/1973	Uğur ALTUN	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
86.	53172/19	Gönen v. Türkiye	27/09/2019	Fikret GÖNEN 21/05/1975	Yeşim KAYALI GÖNEN	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
87.	53285/19	Beyazıt v. Türkiye	20/09/2019	Arzu BEYAZIT 28/03/1978		Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
88.	53497/19	Koç v. Türkiye	09/10/2019	Ali KOÇ 22/07/1974	Hanifi BAYRI	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
89.	53539/19	Şahinkaya v. Türkiye	28/08/2019	Murat ŞAHİNKAYA 25/06/1982	Burcu AKYÜZ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
90.	53547/19	Ekinci v. Türkiye	28/08/2019	Mehmet EKİNCİ 02/01/1988	Atıf DOĞUŞ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
91.	54194/19	Demirtaş v. Türkiye	11/10/2019	Nidai DEMİRTAŞ 19/02/1979	İbrahim Menderes ÇÖLOVA	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
92.	54226/19	Güngör v. Türkiye	25/09/2019	Engin GÜNGÖR 06/01/1983	Elif Nurbanu OR	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
93.	56008/19	Kalaycı v. Türkiye	07/10/2019	Emrah KALAYCI 01/12/1981	Muhammet ATALAY	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
94.	56175/19	Avcı v. Türkiye	23/09/2019	Sadettin AVCI 04/01/1971	Emre AKARYILDIZ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
95.	56405/19	Uğurlu v. Türkiye	17/10/2019	Hüseyin UĞURLU 01/12/1975	Mehmet Fatih İÇER	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
96.	56568/19	Sarışık v. Türkiye	16/10/2019	Alper SARIŞIK 10/05/1989	Hürriyet SÜMER KALA	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
97.	56778/19	Okur v. Türkiye	24/09/2019	İbrahim OKUR 29/12/1966	Mehmet ÖNCÜ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
98.	57719/19	Şahin v. Türkiye	25/10/2019	Ömer ŞAHİN 05/09/1982	Miraç TAMER	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
99.	58816/19	Hendek v. Türkiye	09/10/2019	Hasan HENDEK 15/01/1972	Tarık Said GÜLDİBİ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
100.	59635/19	Yeşil v. Türkiye	07/11/2019	Ufuk YEŞİL 16/09/1979	Merve Elif GÜRACAR	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
101.	63404/19	Püsküllüoğlu v. Türkiye	25/11/2019	Mustafa PÜSKÜLLÜOĞLU 09/02/1984		Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
102.	64701/19	Gün v. Türkiye	05/12/2019	Hüsnü GÜN 05/05/1985	Kübra DEMİRTAŞ	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
103.	1068/20	Özdemir v. Türkiye	17/12/2019	Erdal ÖZDEMİR 29/09/1981	Kubilay PARLAK	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
104.	2167/20	Yılmaz v. Türkiye	10/12/2019	Ali Çetin YILMAZ 01/08/1976		Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
105.	2511/20	Çolak v. Türkiye	26/12/2019	Ümit Zafer ÇOLAK 30/08/1974	Şeyma SÜMENGEN	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
106.	6245/20	Ulusoy v. Türkiye	13/01/2020	Sinan ULUSOY 11/11/1977	Samet CAM	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
107.	6385/20	Çakmak v. Türkiye	09/01/2020	Ahmet Salim ÇAKMAK 14/04/1988	Kadriye TÜMEN	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor
108.	9017/20	Barut v. Türkiye	24/01/2020	Mehmet BARUT 27/03/1987 Esra BARUT 09/10/1989	Elkan ALBAYRAK	Ordinary judge or public prosecutor Ordinary judge or public prosecutor