European Court of Human Rights

 

 

FIFTH SECTION

 

 

 

 

 

CASE OF KONONOVA AND OTHERS v. UKRAINE

 

(Application no. 11770/03 and 89 other applications)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

JUDGMENT

 

 

STRASBOURG

 

6 June 2013

 

 

 

This judgment is final. It may be subject to editorial revision.




In the case of Kononova and Others v. Ukraine,

The European Court of Human Rights (Fifth Section), sitting as a Committee composed of:

          Boštjan M. Zupančič, President,
          Ann Power-Forde,
          Helena Jäderblom, judges,
and Stephen Phillips, Deputy Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 14 May 2013,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE




  The case originated in 90 applications against Ukraine lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by Ukrainian nationals, one Russian national (application no. 56464/07) and companies based in Ukraine. Their details are specified in the appended tables (“the applicants”).




  In applications nos. 35771/07, 28061/08, 28071/08, 46953/08, 25260/09, 26397/09, 20032/10, 22620/10, 25288/10 the applicants died in course of the proceedings before the Court. Their next-of-kin expressed a wish to pursue the applications.




  Mr Andriy Salnikov (application no. 28061/08) and Ms Diana Salnikova (application no. 28071/08) are brother and sister. They are both heirs of their deceased father and challenge the lengthy non-enforcement of the same judgment adopted in favour of their father.




  The Government are represented by their Agent, Mr Nazar Kulchytskyy.




  The applications listed in Appendices 1 and 2 were communicated to the Government on various dates in 2003-2011.




  The Russian Government, having been informed of their right to intervene in the proceedings in respect of the applicant in application no. 56464/07 (Article 36 § 1 of the Convention and Rule 44 of the Rules of Court), indicated that they did not wish to exercise that right.

THE FACTS

THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE




  On the dates set out in the appended tables domestic courts and labour disputes commissions delivered decisions according to which the applicants were entitled to various pecuniary amounts or to have certain actions taken in their favour. The decisions became enforceable. However, the applicants were unable to obtain the enforcement of the decisions in due time.




  Some of the applicants also made submissions concerning factual and legal matters unrelated to the above non-enforcement issues.

THE LAW

I.  JOINDER OF THE APPLICATIONS




  In view of the similarity of the applications in terms of the principal legal issues raised, the Court finds it appropriate to join them.

II.  THE SECOND APPLICANT IN APPLICATION No. 47387/06




  The second applicant in application no. 47387/06, Ms Lyubov Rusanova, complains about delay in payment of the salary caused by her former employer (State agency) and about the outcome of the proceedings before the domestic courts. The applicant has however failed to establish that any salary was outstanding, and has in any event failed to show that she appealed against the sole decision in the Court’s file. The Court finds that this part of application no. 47387/06 must be rejected as inadmissible in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.

III.  THE STANDING OF THE APPLICANTS IN APPLICATIONS Nos. 35771/07, 28061/08, 28071/08, 46953/08, 25260/09, 26397/09, 20032/10, 22620/10, 25288/10




  The Court considers that in applications listed in paragraph 2 (see above) the next-of-kin of the deceased applicants have standing to continue the proceedings in their stead (see, among other authorities, Mironov v. Ukraine, no. 19916/04, § 12, 14 December 2006).

IV.  ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLES 6 AND 13 OF THE CONVENTION AND OF ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1




  The applicants complained about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of the effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints. Expressly or in substance they relied on Articles 6 § 1 and 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.




  The Court notes that the above complaints (see paragraph 12 above) are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 (a) of the Convention. It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible.




  The Court finds that the decisions in the applicants’ favour were not enforced in due time, for which the State authorities were responsible.




  Having regard to its well-established case-law on the subject (see Yuriy Nikolayevich Ivanov v. Ukraine, no. 40450/04, §§ 56-58 and 66-70, 15 October 2009) the Court finds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 on account of the prolonged non-enforcement of the decisions in the applicants’ favour. It also considers that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention in that the applicants did not have an effective domestic remedy to redress the damage created by such non-enforcement.

V.  OTHER ALLEGED VIOLATIONS OF THE CONVENTION




  Some of the applicants raised other complaints under the Convention which the Court has carefully examined. In the light of all the material in its possession, and in so far as the matters complained of are within its competence, the Court finds that they do not disclose any appearance of a violation of the rights and freedoms set out in the Convention or its Protocols.




  It follows that those complaints are manifestly ill-founded and must be rejected in accordance with Article 35 §§ 3 (a) and 4 of the Convention.

VI.  APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION




  Article 41 of the Convention provides:

“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”




  Bearing in mind its previous decisions on the matter (see Kharuk and Others v. Ukraine [Committee], no. 703/05 and 115 other applications, § 25, 26 July 2012), the Court considers it reasonable and equitable to award 3,000 euros (EUR) to each applicant in the applications which concern non-enforcement delays exceeding three years (the applications tabulated in Appendix 1 with the exception of applications nos. 28061/08 and 28071/08) and EUR 1,500 to each applicant in the other applications (the applications tabulated in Appendix 2 and applications nos. 28061/08 and 28071/08). These sums are to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, as well as costs and expenses.




  The Court finds that the applicants in applications nos. 28061/08 and 28071/08 are to be awarded 1,500 euros (EUR) each, as, being heirs to their deceased father’s estate in equal parts, they both challenge the non-enforcement of the same judgment adopted in favour of their late father (see § 3 above).




  The Court considers that the respondent State has an outstanding obligation to enforce the judgments which remain enforceable.




  The Court considers it appropriate that the default interest rate should be based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to which should be added three percentage points.




  The Court finally recalls that in the case of Kharuk it reiterated that it is an international judicial authority contingent on the consent of the States signatory to the Convention, that its principal task is to secure respect for human rights, rather than compensate applicants’ losses minutely and exhaustively, and that in cases involving many similarly situated victims a unified approach may be called for (see Kharuk v. Ukraine cited above, §§ 23, 24).




  The Court considers that still further standardisation of awards in these cases is called for, and intends, in future judgments dealing with standard non-enforcement complaints against Ukraine, to award a single lump sum to each applicant, regardless of the non-enforcement period involved.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY

1.  Decides to join the applications;

 

2.  Declares application no. 47387/06 inadmissible insofar as it is made by Ms Lyubov Rusanova;

 

3.  Declares the complaints of the applicants under Article 6 § 1 and Article 13 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the lengthy non-enforcement of the decisions given in their favour and about the lack of effective domestic remedies in respect of those complaints admissible and the remainder of the applications inadmissible;

4.  Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1;

 

5.  Holds that there has been a violation of Article 13 of the Convention;

 

6.  Holds

(a)  that the respondent State is to enforce the domestic decisions in the applicants’ favour which remain enforceable, and is to pay, within three months, EUR 3,000 (three thousand euros) to each applicant or his or her estate in the applications tabulated in Appendix 1 (with the exception of applications nos. 28061/08 and 28071/08) and EUR 1,500 (one thousand five hundred euros)

(i)  to each applicant or his or her estate in the applications tabulated in Appendix 2 and

(ii)  in applications nos. 28061/08 and 28071/08

in respect of pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, and costs and expenses, plus any tax that may be chargeable to the applicants on the above amounts which are to be converted into the national currency at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b)  that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points.

Done in English, and notified in writing on 6 June 2013, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

      Stephen Phillips                                                          Boštjan M. Zupančič
     Deputy Registrar                                                                   President




APPENDIX 1

(non-enforcement delays three years and more)

 

No.	Application no. and date of introduction	Applicants’ name and date of birth	Relevant domestic decisions
1.	11770/03 28/03/2003	Svetlana Sergeyevna KONONOVA 04/04/1957	Suvorosvkyy District Court of Kherson, 06/06/2003 as amended by the Kherson Regional Court of Appeal, 11/02/2004
2.	17953/05 06/05/2005	Nikolay Ivanovich DOVGALYOV 19/09/1957	Tsentralno-Miskyy District Court of Makiyivka, 12/08/2003, as amended by the Donetsk Regional Court of Appeal on 04/12/2003
3.	26918/05 06/07/2005	Nonna Igorevna PORTNOVA 27/12/1950	Commercial Court of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, 12/12/2002
4.	18448/06 25/04/2006	PARITET LTD, TOV VKP	Kyiv Commercial Court, 19/02/2002
5.	18673/06 22/04/2006	Valeriy Viktorovych SYNELNYKOV 25/07/1968	1) Romny Court, 20/01/2005   2) Romby Court, 21/11/2006
6.	20933/06 13/05/2006	Lyudmila Fyodorovna BOBROVA 12/05/1963	Nova Kakhovka Court, 27/09/2005
7.	34409/06 12/07/2006	Vasiliy Aleksandrovich TERNOVIK 18/01/1960	Novogrodivka Court, 21/12/1999
8.	34596/06 02/08/2006	Stanislav Ivanovych PRUDKYY 30/05/1963	1) Military Court of Kyiv the Garrison, 09/09/1999   2) Bila Tserkva Court, 24/06/2005
9.	41295/06 04/10/2006	Lyudmyla Viktorivna BURYAN 10/10/1939	Berdychiv Court, 18/12/2003
10.	47358/06 18/11/2006	Olena Yevgeniyivna LYOVOCHKINA 26/09/1959	Zavodskyy District Court of Mykolayiv, 05/06/2001, having regard to the bailiffs’ misconduct as acknowledged by the Mykolayiv Regional Court of Appeal on 01/02/2006
11.	47387/06 07/11/2006	Yelena Yevgenyevna GRYUNER 23/09/1958   Lyubov Aleksandrovna RUSANOVA 09/12/1948	Lenynskyy District Court of Zaporyzhzhya, 28/09/1999, rendered in respect of the first applicant
12.	9229/07 06/02/2007	Olena Mykhaylivna PIKUSH 20/05/1941	Petrykivskyy District Court of the Dnipropetrovsk Region, 09/04/1996, having regard to the bailiffs’ misconduct as acknowledged by the same court on 08/06/2005
13.	9356/07 12/02/2007	Mykola Yevgenovych TATARENKO 08/11/1959	1) Berezneguvate, 13/12/2005   2) Berezneguvate, 10/11/2006   3) Berezneguvate, 16/03/2007
14.	19149/07 20/04/2007	Mykola Petrovych POPOV 30/11/1929	1) Berdychiv Court, 15/09/2006   2) Berdychiv Court, 28/09/2006
15.	22887/07 11/05/2007	Mariya Fedorivna ODNOKOPYLA 22/06/1942	Podilskyy District Court of Kyiv, 17/04/2002
16.	24362/07 26/05/2007	Irina Yuryevna TIMOFEYEVA 13/01/1959	1) Nova Kakhovka Court, 25/10/2004   2) Nova Kakhovka Court, 02/02/2005
17.	25143/07 29/05/2007	Viktor Feofanovich ZATURINSKIY 08/04/1948	1) Labour Disputes Commission of the "Yuzhnyy Elektromashynostroitelnyy Zavod" OJSC, 11/11/1999   2) Nova Kakhovka Court, 02/03/2007   3) Nova Kakhovka Court, 15/05/2007
18.	26676/07 15/06/2007	KONEKS LTD, TOV 22/08/1956	Kharkiv Regional Commercial Court, 07/12/2005
19.	31465/07 23/06/2007	Yakiv Mykhaylovych GORDIY 17/01/1945	1) Kosiv Court, 30/01/2006   2) Kosiv Court, 04/09/2003
20.	34772/07 11/07/2007	Vasiliy Nikolayevich KOVALENKO 16/03/1969   Boris Nikolayevich ADAMOVICH 19/11/1958   Tatyana Vasilyevna BRUSLINOVSKAYA 13/02/1961   Anna Ivanovna DANILENKO 28/01/1947   Yekaterina Nikolayevna DANILENKO 06/12/1983   Antonina Nikolayevna KRAYNYAYA 15/11/1951   Natalya Mikhaylovna KULAYEVA 20/08/1957	Applicant 1: 1) Krasnyy Luch Court, 13/11/2002 2) Krasnyy Luch Court, 01/06/2005   Applicant 2: 3) Krasnyy Luch Court, 27/09/2002 4) Krasnyy Luch Court, 06/06/2005   Applicant 3: 5) Krasnyy Luch Court, 31/07/2002 6) Krasnyy Luch Court, 16/05/2005   Applicant 4: 7) Krasnyy Luch Court, 18/05/2005   Applicant 5: 8) Krasnyy Luch Court, 18/05/2005   Applicant 6: 9) Krasnyy Luch Court, 03/01/2003 10) Krasnyy Luch Town Court, 18/07/2005   Applicant 7: 11) Krasnyy Luch Court, 09/12/2003 12) Krasnyy Luch Court, 07/06/2005
21.	35771/07 20/07/2007	Lyudmila Pavlovna TOLSTOKOROVA 27/01/1937	1) Nova Kakhovka Court, 25/10/2004   2) Nova Kakhovka Court, 23/02/2005
22.	35858/07 06/08/2007	Andrey Viktorovich MALTYZ 15/08/1972	Lugansk Regional Court of Appeal, 25/02/2008
23.	40767/07 07/08/2007	Nina Petrovna PAVLENKO 26/02/1946	Pervomayskyy Court, 12/12/2005
24.	44386/07 08/08/2006	Vitaliy Grygorovych PASYOVIN 18/07/1957	Bila Tserkva Court, 30/09/2005
25.	51922/07 08/11/2007	Vladimir Dmitriyevich PUZENKO 15/01/1960	Crimea Court of Appeal, 17/04/2007
26.	52743/07 12/11/2007	Marina Nikolayevna ISAYEVA 09/08/1964	1) Kyivskyy District Court of Odesa, 29/05/2003   2) Kyivskyy District Court of Odesa, 18/05/2006
27.	56464/07 15/11/2007	Aleksandr Ivanovich KOLOSOV 26/03/1954	Krasnyy Luch Court, 23/03/1998
28.	1865/08 15/12/2007	Nikolay Grigoryevich SHEVYCH 18/10/1952	Sverdlovsk Court, 27/05/2004
29.	15601/08 21/03/2008	Aksentiy Platonovich DMITRASHEK 31/08/1940	1) Kirovske Cour (Donetsk Region), 31/05/2005   2) Kirovske Cour (Donetsk Region), 13/06/2005   3) Kirovske Cour (Donetsk Region), case no. 2-533, 01/06/2006   4) Kirovske Cour (Donetsk Region), case no. 2-534, 01/06/2006
30.	20775/08 17/04/2008	Kateryna Fedorivna FESENKO 02/04/1949	Kyivskyy District Court of Poltava, 31/07/2002
31.	27288/08 22/05/2008	Viktor Aleksandrovich MIKHAYLOV 31/05/1973	1) Krasnyy Luch Court, 22/06/2007   2) Krasnyy Luch Court, 28/09/2007
32.	28061/08 05/06/2008	Andriy Sergiyovych SALNIKOV 24/12/1985	Military Court of the Kyiv Harrison, 27/02/2002
33.	28071/08 05/06/2008	Diana Sergiyivna SALNIKOVA 05/02/1987	Military Court of the Kyiv Harrison, 27/02/2002
34.	28090/08 16/05/2008	Andriy Mykhaylovych DANILOV 14/12/1966	Irpin Court, 23/11/2006
35.	32466/08 12/06/2008	NAK, TOV	Kyivskyy District Court of Poltava, 16/03/2006
36.	37355/08 28/07/2008	Oleksandr Volodymyrovych PECHONCHYK 01/07/1966	Volodymyretskyy District Court of Rivne Region, 16/07/2002 as modified by the same court on 26/06/2008 (in light of the judgments of the same court dated 05/06/2007 and of the Lviv Administrative Court of Appeal dated 11/09/2008)
37.	46953/08 22/09/2008	Valentina Mikhaylovna MELNIKOVA 25/05/1931	Balaklavskyy District Court of Sevastopol, 23/06/2008
38.	50872/08 19/09/2008	Ganna Oleksiyivna SITARUK 06/08/1926	Slavuta Court, 05/12/2002
39.	61421/08 03/12/2008	Yevgeniya Trokhymivna GUTSOL 18/11/1937	1) Bershad Court, 27/04/2007   2) Vinnytsya Circuit Administrative Court, 15/09/2008
40.	12892/09 19/02/2009	Anatoliy Grygoriyovych ARTYUKH 30/10/1948	Mukachevo Court, 12/03/2007, quashed in the light of newly discovered evidence by the Mukachevo Court on 24/12/2010
41.	25260/09 21/04/2009	Vasyl Yukhymovych LEGKYY 11/11/1932	Tetiyiv Court, 19/11/2007
42.	26397/09 04/03/2009	Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich MATSEGORA 19/04/1958	Slovyansk Court, 13/03/2000
43.	32372/09 19/05/2009	Galina Vasilyevna OLENICH 01/08/1945	1) Slovyansk Court, 15/03/2002   2) Slovyansk Court, 12/04/2002   3) Slovyansk Court, 04/06/2003
44.	33588/09 11/06/2009	Valeriy Fedorovych KRASYUK 13/09/1948	Chervonograd Court, 13/06/2005
45.	38444/09 01/07/2009	Nadiya Mykolayivna MELNYCHUK 10/02/1958	1) Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 23/08/2005   2) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 05/10/2007, Quashed By the Higher Administrative Court on 19/07/2011   3) Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 21/11/2007
46.	44965/09 06/08/2009	Fekla Antonovna MUKHINA 20/12/1923	Antratsyt Court, 28/09/2006
47.	46337/09 16/08/2009	ADEPT, PP	Sevastopol Commercial Court of Appeal, 28/11/2005, quashed by the Sevastopol Commercial Court of Appeal on 21/06/2010
48.	53257/09 25/09/2009	Igor Viktorovych FEDOTOV 30/01/1964	Desnyanskyy District Court of Kyiv, 24/04/2008
49.	54385/09 02/10/2009	Taisiya Kostyantynivna TATARETS 06/11/1940	Zavodskyy District Court of Dniprodzerzhynsk, 10/05/2006, as amended by the Dnipropetrovsk Regional Court of Appeal on 13/07/2006 and by the Supreme Court of Ukraine on 25/12/2008
50.	54564/09 01/10/2009	Oleksandr Fedorovych SERDYUK 26/04/1962	1) Avtozavodskyy District Court of Kremenchuk, 04/09/2008   2) Avtozavodskyy District Court of Kremenchuk, 01/10/2008
51.	54594/09 29/09/2009	Dmytro Grygorovych KAMENSKYY 11/05/1983	Pervomayskyy Court, 06/09/2007 as amended by the Kharkiv Regional Court of Appeal on 09/10/2007
52.	59199/09 20/10/2009	Anatoliy Ivanovich RASKHODOV 24/06/1952	Labour Disputes Commission of the Lisychanskyy Zavod GTV , 14/06/2001
53.	65102/09 27/11/2009	Vladimir Anatolyevich SENIK 27/01/1971	Kupyansk Court, 30/11/2001
54.	67309/09 11/12/2009	Taras Yosyfovych GENTOSH	Drogobych Court, 29/12/2008
55.	9993/10 04/02/2010	Vyacheslav Pavlovych OVCHYNNIKOV 27/07/1943	Mukachevo Court, 13/11/2006
56.	11325/10 16/02/2010	Larysa Mykolayivna RYBALKO 26/03/1958   Yevgen Opanasovych RYBALKO 18/03/1955 Denys Yevgenovych RYBALKO 29/08/1981   Dmytro Yevgenovych RYBALKO 29/08/1981	Chervonozavodskyy District Court of Kharkiv, 22/11/2005
57.	11826/10 11/02/2010	Galyna Oleksandrivna TARANENKO 30/03/1951	1) Pervomayskyy Court, 25/12/2007   2) Pervomayskyy Court, 26/02/2008
58.	11976/10 16/02/2010	Anatoliy Danilovich MATVIYENKO 23/05/1943	1) Lugansk Circuit Administrative Court, 07/07/2009 as amended by the Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeal on 25/11/2009   2) Artemivskyy District Court of Lugansk, 08/02/2008 as amended by the Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeal on 12/06/2008
59.	13482/10 22/02/2010	Aleksandr Vasilyevich MOROZOV 02/03/1958	1) Krasnyy Luch Court, 23/09/2008 as amended by the Lugansk Regional Court of Appeal, 10/12/2008   2) Krasnyy Luch Court, 03/09/2009 as amended by the Lugansk Regional Court of Appeal, 10/02/2010
60.	15301/10 24/02/2010	Oleksandr Mykolayovych SAFONOV 19/03/1947   Valeriy Ivanovych MEDVEDEV 29/07/1946   Valentyn Fedorovych STOROZHENKO 07/09/1946   Stanislav Stanislavovych KUSHTAN 28/06/1941   Oleksandr Arsentyovych LISNENKO 06/12/1947   Sergiy Oleksandrovych ZAGLUSHCHENKO 08/06/1955	Applicant 1: Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 27/01/2009 (two judgments on the same day: 2a-3/09 and 2a-4/09);   Applicant 2: Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, February 2009 (enforcement proceedings no. 11946771, enforcement writ no. 2a-64 issued on 16/02/2009);   Applicant 3: Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 16/02/2009;   Applicant 4: Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 12/02/2009;   Applicant 5: Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 08/12/2008 as amended by the Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeal, 04/03/2009;   Applicant 6: Kirovskyy District Court of Donetsk, 28/01/2009
61.	16144/10 03/03/2010	REAGENT, TOV 09/06/1989	Khmenlytskyy Regional Commercial Court, 14/07/2004
62.	16644/10 09/03/2010	Vitaliy Vitalyevich DYACHKIN 14/08/1976	Tsentralno-Miskyy District Court of Gorlivka, 05/06/2009
63.	17363/10 16/03/2010	Volodymyr Yuriyovych SIKAN 21/08/1968	Zhytomyr Circuit Administrative Court, 11/08/2007
64.	17369/10 15/03/2010	Irina Mikhaylovna ROMANOVA 01/12/1957	Krasnyy Luch Court, 05/05/2004
65.	17477/10 19/03/2010	Nadezhda Nikolayevna PALADIY 22/10/1952	1) Kerch Court, 06/08/2004   2) Kerch Court, 24/11/2004
66.	17674/10 20/03/2010	Mykola Dmytrovych GRECHANYY 21/04/1949	Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 14/10/2008
67.	20032/10 17/03/2010	Georgiy Ivanovych BILOUS 24/04/1926	Avtozavodsyy District Court of Kremenchuk, 26/06/2008
68.	22620/10 25/03/2010	Petr Kuzmich KOVALENKO 11/07/1929	1) Kharkiv Regional Administrative Court, 17/11/2008   2) Balakliya Court, 20/07/2009
69.	25360/10 23/04/2010	Vitaliy Gennadiyovych PANKOV 06/10/1972	Krasnyy Lyman Court, 24/11/2003
70.	25363/10 23/04/2010	Ryta Vitaliyivna ADAMOVSKA 10/06/1967	Krasnyy Lyman Court, 24/11/2003
71.	26232/10 20/04/2010	Mariya Ivanivna ARTYUKHOVA 21/08/1937	Velykyy Burluk Court,13/03/2008
72.	26676/10 02/04/2010	Nikolay Nikolayevich YUKHIMENKO 17/09/1942	Court of Appeal of the Crimea, 30/09/2008
73.	28834/10 17/04/2010	Grigoriy Vasilyevich ALFEROV 27/04/1960	Kharkiv Administrative Court of Appeal, 13/04/2009
74.	29205/10 12/05/2010	Vladimir Stepanovich ANTOSHCHUK 15/04/1950	1) Torez Court, 27/11/2000   2) Torez Court, 07/12/2007
75.	30803/10 17/05/2010	Nataliya Mykolayivna SAVCHENKO 12/01/1960	Darnytskyy District Court of Kyiv, 29/03/2008
76.	42600/10 19/07/2010	Antonina Nikolayevna KOSHELEVSKAYA 03/04/1962   Yevgeniy Aleksandrovich KOSHELEVSKIY 03/06/1987	Simferopol District Court of the Crimea, 13/04/2001
77.	51950/10 15/07/2010	Vita Grygorivna NIKITCHENKO 25/04/1983	1) Kharkiv Regional Commercial Court, 24/12/2008   2) Kharkiv Regional Commercial Court, 13/07/2009
78.	65624/10 28/10/2010	Vladimir Aleksandrovich BORISOV 06/02/1958	Krasnyy Luch Court, 09/02/2007
79.	66602/10 28/10/2010	Anatoliy Ivanovych ZHUK 12/06/1966	Zamostyanskyy District Court of Vinnytsya, 07/06/2006
80.	66622/10 20/10/2010	Raisa Nikolayevna KORZH 23/02/1962	1) Labour Disputes Commission of “Zavod Mayak”, 01/04/2009   2) Selydovsk Court, 07/07/2008
81.	66882/10 05/11/2010	Valentyna Mykolayivna KUCHER 03/04/1969	1) Svitlovodsk Court, 31/07/2006   2) Svitlovodsk Court, 22/12/2006
82.	69639/10 11/11/2010	Petro Vasylyovych ZADERZHYNSKYY 15/07/1920	Dobropillya Court, 02/10/2007
83.	5010/11 15/01/2011	Viktor Alekseyevich RASPOPOV 20/10/1935	Pecherskyy District Court of Kyiv, 05/02/2009

 




APPENDIX 2

(non-enforcement delays less than three years)

 

No.	Application no. and date of introduction	Applicants’ name and date of birth	Relevant domestic decisions
84.	60679/08 26/11/2008	Vladyslav Valeriyovych AVDEYENKO 10/06/1977	Ternopil Court, 24/09/2007
85.	50101/09 01/09/2009	Gennadiy Petrovych STROM 26/06/1965	Oleksandriya Court, 06/11/2008
86.	51423/09 09/09/2009	Iryna Ivanivna SKOCHKO 07/03/1971	Oleksandriya Court, 27/02/2009
87.	52625/09 08/09/2009	Olena Volodymyrivna CHAYKA AKA OSTAPENKO 10/05/1979	Oleksandriya Court, 27/02/2009
88.	32380/10 03/06/2010	Nadiya Oleksandrivna ZAGYNAYLO 04/10/1965   Yuliya Andriyivna SLOBODSKA AKA ZAGYNAYLO 21/09/1986	Golosiyivskyy District Court of Kyiv, 19/03/2009
89.	52748/10 04/09/2010	Iryna Dmytrivna ULYANOVA 06/08/1956	1) Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 22/06/2009   2) Zhovtnevyy District Court of Kharkiv, 22/02/2010, as amended by the judgment of the Kharkiv Regional Court of Appeal of 01/06/2010
90.	55471/10 17/09/2010	Viktor Yakovych DRANYSH 28/07/1936	Donetsk Administrative Court of Appeal, 11/08/2009