British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
European Court of Human Rights
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
European Court of Human Rights >>
Dimitar Ivanov FRENKOV v Bulgaria - 7100/07 [2012] ECHR 575 (20 March 2012)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2012/575.html
Cite as:
[2012] ECHR 575
[
New search]
[
Contents list]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
FOURTH
SECTION
DECISION
Dimitar Ivanov FRENKOV against Bulgaria
and 8
other applications
(see table appended)
The
European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting on 20 March
2012 as a Committee composed of:
George
Nicolaou, President,
Zdravka
Kalaydjieva,
Vincent
A. De Gaetano, judges,
and
Fatoş Aracı, Deputy
Section Registrar,
Having
regard to the applications listed in the table below,
Having
regard to the pilot judgment in the case of Finger v. Bulgaria,
no. 37346/05, § 135, 10 May 2011,
Having
regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of
the cases,
Having
deliberated, decides as follows:
PROCEDURE
The
applicants are Bulgarian nationals whose names and dates of birth are
specified in the table below. Some of the applicants were legally
represented. The legal representatives involved were Mr M. Ekimdjiev,
Ms G. Chernicherska, Mr D. Mitkov, Ms S. Vasileva,
Ms S. Lyubenova Neykova, Ms V. Koeva, Mr Y. Georgiev,
Ms Katina Boncheva and Mr V. Stoyanov. The Bulgarian
Government (“the Government”) were represented by their
Agent, Ms M. Dimova, of the Ministry of Justice.
The
essential information as to the length of the proceedings in which
the applicants were involved is indicated in the attached table.
On 8
August 2011 the President of the Fourth Section decided to
communicate the applicants’ complaints under Article 6 § 1
of the Convention concerning the length of civil proceedings and in
some cases the complaints under Article 13 and Article 1 of Protocol
No. 1 of the Convention concerning the lack of effective remedies in
relation to the length and the impact of the length of the
proceedings on property rights.
THE LAW
The
Court considers that in accordance with Rule 42 § 1 of the Rules
of Court, the applications should be joined, given their common legal
background.
On
various dates (see table below) the Court received friendly
settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the
applicants agreed to waive any further claims against Bulgaria in
respect of the facts giving rise to these applications against an
undertaking by the Government to pay them ex gratia sums,
which would cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage, as well as
costs and expenses, and would be free of any taxes that may be
applicable, to be converted into the national
currency of the respondent State at the rate applicable at the date
of settlement. The sums would be payable within three months
from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court
pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human
Rights. In the event of failure to pay these sums within the said
three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest
on them from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal
to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the
default period plus three percentage points. This payment would
constitute the final resolution of the cases.
The
Court takes note of the friendly settlements reached between the
parties. It is satisfied that the settlements are based on respect
for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and
finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the
applications (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention).
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the cases out of
the list.
For these reasons, the Court unanimously
Decides to join the applications;
Decides to strike the applications out of its list of cases.
Fatoş Aracı George Nicolaou
Deputy Registrar President
APPENDIX
No.
|
Application
no.
|
Lodged on
|
Applicant’s
name, year of birth, place of residence
|
Beginning and end of the domestic
proceedings
|
Subject matter of domestic
proceedings
|
Length
of proceedings and instances concerned
|
Communicated complaints
|
Date
of applicant friendly settlement
declaration
|
Date
of Government’s friendly
settlement declaration
|
Friendly settlement sums
(in euros)
|
1.
|
7100/07
|
14/01/2007
|
Dimitar
Ivanov FRENKOV
1956
Plovdiv
|
1)
14/08/1998 – 12/12/2006
(the date on which the judgment of 07/11/2006 entered into force)
2) 27/10/1998 –
14/07/2006
|
1)
Civil proceedings for damages resulting
from an alleged occupational disease
2) Administrative
proceedings on appeal of the medical authorities’ decision
in relation to the alleged occupational disease
|
1)
8 years and 3 months (1 level of
jurisdiction; these proceedings were stayed for several years
waiting the outcome of the second proceedings)
2) 7 years and
8 months (2 levels of jurisdiction)
|
Art. 6
§ 1 (length of proceedings)
Art. 13 (lack of effective
remedies in respect of length)
|
|
|
|
2.
|
7741/07
|
05/01/2007
|
Yordanka
Ilieva HRISTOVA
1923
Sofia
|
1)
First set of proceedings
05/04/1993
– 05/07/2006
2) Second set of
proceedings
26/08/1997 –
05/07/2007
|
Restitution and
rei-vindicatio
proceedings
|
13
years and 3 months for the first set of proceedings (3 levels
of jurisdiction)
9 years and
10 months for the second set of
proceedings (3 levels of jurisdiction)
|
Art. 6
§ 1 (length of proceedings)
Art. 13
(lack of effective remedies in respect of length)
Art. 1 of Protocol No. 1
(impact of length on property rights)
|
|
|
|
3.
|
7815/07
|
08/02/2007
|
Lyuben
Petrov PETKOV
1936
Sofia
|
19/09/2000
– 08/08/2006
|
Labour dispute
|
5 years and
10 months (3 levels of
jurisdiction)
|
Art. 6
§ 1 (length of proceedings)
Art. 13 (lack of effective
remedies in respect of length)
|
|
|
|
4.
|
12591/07
|
26/02/2007
|
Vasil
Strahilov NESHEV
1946
Pernik
|
21/03/2000 – 31/08/2006
|
Labour dispute
|
6 years and 5 months (3 levels of jurisdiction)
|
Art. 6
§ 1 (length of proceedings)
|
|
|
|
5.
|
12716/07
|
16/02/2007
|
Todor
Stefanov TANGALOV
1961
Veliko Tarnovo
|
29/02/2000
– 24/10/2007
|
Labour dispute
|
7 years and
10 months (3 levels of
jurisdiction)
|
Art. 6
§ 1 (length of proceedings)
Art.
13 (lack of effective remedies in respect of length)
|
|
|
|
6.
|
16855/07
|
21/12/2006
|
Mariyka
Kirilova BLASKOVA
1941
Varna
Violeta
Alexandrova BLASKOVA
1968
Varna
|
16/04/1999
–
28/10/2008
|
Proceedings for
compensation for a property that could not be denationalised
|
9 years and 6 months (2 levels of jurisdiction)
|
Art. 6
§ 1 (length of proceedings)
Art. 1
of Protocol No. 1 (impact of length on property rights)
Art. 13 (lack of effective
remedies in respect of length)
|
|
|
|
7.
|
17555/07
|
27/03/2007
|
TOTEL
OOD
Sofia
|
01/08/1997 –
1) Phase
of opening of bankruptcy proceedings –01/11/2004
2)
Phase of declaring the applicant
company bankrupt –
29/09/2006
|
Bankruptcy
proceedings
|
9 years and 2
months (3 levels of jurisdiction for the opening of bankruptcy
proceedings and 2 levels of jurisdiction for declaring the
applicant company bankrupt)
|
Art. 6
§ 1 (length of proceedings)
Art. 1 of Protocol No. 1 (impact
of length on property rights)
|
|
|
|
8.
|
17777/07
|
27/03/2007
|
Teodora
Ivanova SOTIROVA
1950
Plovdiv
Nedyalka
Petrova IVANOVA
1927
Plovdiv
Mariyana
Ivanova UNGER
Plovdiv
|
01/06/1993 –
07/11/2006
|
Rei-vindicatio
proceedings
|
13 years and
5 months (3 levels of jurisdiction)
|
Art. 6
§ 1 (length of proceedings)
Art. 13 (lack of effective
remedies in respect of length)
|
|
|
|
9.
|
17856/07
|
14/12/2006
|
Yordan
Nikolov KANCHEV
1961
Pazardzhik
|
7/12/2000 –
15/09/2006
|
Labour dispute
|
5 years and 9 months (3 levels of jurisdiction)
|
Art. 6 § 1 (length of proceedings)
Art. 13 (lack of effective
remedies in respect of length)
|
|
|
|