European Court of Human Rights
You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Adnan BAYRAM v Turkey - 56524/09 [2011] ECHR 1766 (27 September 2011)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2011/1766.html
Cite as: [2011] ECHR 1766
[New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]
SECOND SECTION
DECISION
Application no.
56524/09
by Adnan BAYRAM
against Turkey
The European Court of Human Rights (Second Section), sitting on 27 September 2011 as a Committee composed of:
Dragoljub
Popović,
President,
András
Sajó,
Paulo
Pinto de Albuquerque,
judges,
and Françoise
Elens-Passos, Deputy
Section Registrar,
Having regard to the above application lodged on 14 October 2009,
Having regard to the formal declarations accepting a friendly settlement of the case,
Having deliberated, decides as follows:
PROCEDURE
The applicant, Mr Adnan Bayram, is a Turkish national who was born in 1955 and lives in Diyarbakır. He was represented before the Court by Mr M. Batı and Ms E. K. Batı, lawyers practising in Diyarbakır. The Turkish Government (“the Government”) were represented by their Agent.
The applicant complained under Article 6 § 1 of the Convention about the length of civil proceedings he had brought under Law no. 466, pertaining to the payment of compensation to persons unlawfully arrested or detained. The case appears to be still pending.
On 17 August 2010 and 28 February 2011 the Court received friendly settlement declarations signed by the parties under which the applicant agreed to waive any further claims against Turkey in respect of the facts giving rise to this application against an undertaking by the Government to pay him EUR 4,000 (four thousand euros) to cover any pecuniary and non-pecuniary damage as well as costs and expenses, which would be converted into Turkish Liras at the rate applicable on the date of payment, and will be free of any taxes that may be applicable. It will be payable within three months from the date of notification of the decision taken by the Court pursuant to Article 37 § 1 of the European Convention on Human Rights. In the event of failure to pay this sum within the said three-month period, the Government undertook to pay simple interest on it, from expiry of that period until settlement, at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points. The payment will constitute the final resolution of the case.
THE LAW
The Court takes note of the friendly settlement reached between the parties. It is satisfied that the settlement is based on respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols and finds no reasons to justify a continued examination of the application (Article 37 § 1 in fine of the Convention).
In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike the case out of the list.
For these reasons, the Court unanimously
Decides to strike the application out of its list of cases.
Françoise Elens-Passos Dragoljub
Popović
Deputy Registrar President