European Court of Human Rights

---

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> Meltex and Mesrop Movsesyan v Armenia - 32283/04 (Execution of the judgment) [2011] ECHR 1091 (7 July 2011)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2011/1091.html
Cite as: [2011] ECHR 1091

---

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

---

Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)39¹

Execution of the judgment of the European Court of Human Rights

Meltex and Mesrop Movsesyan against Armenia

(Application No. 32283/04, judgment of 17/06/2008, final on 17/09/2008)

The Committee of Ministers, under the terms of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, which provides that the Committee supervises the execution of final judgments of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter “the Convention” and “the Court”);

Having regard to the judgment transmitted by the Court to the Committee once it had become final;

Recalling that the violation of the Convention found by the Court in this case concerns the applicant company’s right to freedom of expression on account of the refusal by the National Television and Radio Commission (NTRC), on seven occasions in 2002 and 2003, to deliver to the applicant a broadcasting license without giving reasons for its decisions (violation of Article 10) (see details in Appendix);

Having invited the government of the respondent state to inform the Committee of the measures taken to comply with its obligation under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention to abide by the judgment;

Having examined the information provided by the government in accordance with the Committee’s Rules for the application of Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention;

Having satisfied itself that, within the time-limit set, the respondent state paid the applicant the just satisfaction provided in the judgment (see details in Appendix),

Recalling that a finding of violations by the Court requires, over and above the payment of just satisfaction awarded by the Court in its judgments, the adoption by the respondent state, where appropriate:

- of individual measures to put an end to the violations and erase their consequences so as to achieve as far as possible restitutio in integrum; and

- of general measures preventing similar violations;

Having taken note that the applicant company had participated in a tender in December 2010, that it received a reasoned decision from the NTRC and that it has the possibility to contest the results of the licensing tender in the courts of the Republic of Armenia ;

Having taken note of the authorities’ commitment that the NTRC will fully and properly substantiate and reason its decisions, “both in respect of winners of competitions as well as other participants”;

Recalling that, beyond the above commitment, there are ongoing discussions, with the assistance of the Council of Europe and the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe, on amendments to the TV and Radio Broadcasting Act, and that these discussions provide an opportunity to increase legal certainty by facilitating the enactment of a provision in the Law expressly requiring the NTRC to give full reasons for all its decisions on broadcast licensing,

DECLARES, having examined the measures taken by the respondent state (see Appendix), that it has exercised its functions under Article 46, paragraph 2, of the Convention in this case and

DECIDES to close the examination of this case.

Appendix to Resolution CM/ResDH(2011)39

Information about the measures to comply with the judgment in the case of

Meltex and Mesrop Movsesyan against Armenia

Introductory case summary

The case concerns a violation of the applicant company’s freedom of expression on account of the refusal by the National Television and Radio Commission (NTRC), on seven occasions in 2002 and 2003, to deliver to the applicant a broadcasting license (violation of Article 10).

The European Court concluded that there had been interference with the applicant company’s freedom to impart information and ideas and that this interference had not met the requirement of lawfulness under the European Convention. The Court noted in particular that a procedure which did not require a licensing body to justify its decisions did not provide adequate protection against arbitrary interference by a public authority with the fundamental right to freedom of expression.

I. Payment of just satisfaction and individual measures

a) Details of just satisfaction

Pecuniary damage	Non-pecuniary damage	Costs and expenses	Total
-	20000 EUR	10000 EUR	30000 EUR
Paid on 27/11/2008

b) Individual measures

A call for new licensing tenders for digital broadcasting on 25 national and local frequencies was announced on 20 July 2010. The applicant company took part in a tender for one frequency (competition No. 11). The results of the licensing tender “On winners in the 11th competition” are set out in Decree No. 96 A of the National Television and Radio Commission, dated 16 December 2010. The applicant company did not win the tender. Nothing prevents it from contesting the results of the licensing tender in the courts of the Republic of Armenia.

II. General measures

The Law on Amendments and Additions to the Television and Radio Broadcasting Act was adopted on 10 June 2010.

The provision of the TV and Radio Broadcasting Act concerning reasoning of decisions of the NTRC, Article 49(3), reads as follows “The National Commission shall decide the winner of the competition on the basis of the results of the point-based vote. The decision of the National Commission shall be properly substantiated and reasoned”.

In order to alleviate any misunderstanding of the obligation on the NTRC to reason all types of decisions, the Government Agent made the following official statement : “Article 49(3) of the TV and Radio Broadcasting Act should be interpreted in accordance with Article 10 of the Convention, and in the light of the Meltex judgment, in a way that a single decision of the Commission provides a full and proper substantiation and reasoning of the results of the points-based vote, including both in respect of the winner of the competition, as well as of all of its other participants”.

Moreover, the judgment of the Court has been translated into Armenian and published in relevant official publications, both print and electronic, of the Republic of Armenia. The text is available, inter alia, on the official websites of the Ministry of Justice of Armenia, www.moj.am, and of the judiciary of the Republic of Armenia, www.court.am. The Armenian text of the judgment has also been sent to the National Television and Radio Commission and to the Court of Cassation of the Republic of Armenia.

It is therefore expected that any future decision of the NTRC will be taken in conformity with the European Convention of Human Rights and the case-law of the European Court of Human Rights.

III. Conclusions of the respondent state

The government considers that the measures adopted have fully remedied the consequences for the applicant of the violation of the Convention found by the European Court in this case, that these measures will prevent similar violations and that Armenia has thus complied with its obligations under Article 46, paragraph 1, of the Convention.