British and Irish Legal Information Institute

Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information

[Home] [Databases] [World Law] [Multidatabase Search] [Help] [Feedback]

European Court of Human Rights

You are here: BAILII >> Databases >> European Court of Human Rights >> SENCHENKO & Ors - Yakut pensioners cases v. RUSSIA - 32865/06 [2009] ECHR 803 (28 May 2009)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2009/803.html
Cite as: [2009] ECHR 803

[New search] [Contents list] [Printable RTF version] [Help]

FIRST SECTION

CASE OF SENCHENKO AND OTHERS
and 35 other “Yakut pensioners” cases v. RUSSIA

(Applications nos. 32865/06, 3137/07, 3158/07, 5650/07, 5654/07, 5657/07, 5663/07, 6727/07, 6822/07, 6828/07, 6846/07, 8553/07, 8560/07, 11576/07, 11578/07, 11582/07, 11583/07, 11584/07, 11585/07, 12966/07, 13830/07, 13831/07, 13833/07, 13835/07, 19001/07, 19003/07, 19736/07, 19738/07, 19740/07, 19741/07, 19744/07, 19746/07, 19749/07, 19752/07, 20343/07, and 20939/07)

JUDGMENT

STRASBOURG

28 May 2009

This judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44 § 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial revision.

In the case of Senchenko and Others and 35 other “Yakut pensioners” cases v. Russia,

The European Court of Human Rights (First Section), sitting as a Chamber composed of:

Christos Rozakis, President,
Nina Vajić,
Anatoly Kovler,
Khanlar Hajiyev,
Dean Spielmann,
Sverre Erik Jebens,
George Nicolaou, judges,
and Søren Nielsen, Section Registrar,

Having deliberated in private on 7 May 2009,

Delivers the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:

PROCEDURE

The case originated in 36 applications against the Russian Federation lodged with the Court under Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”) by 90 Russian nationals whose names and dates of birth are tabulated in the Annex (“the applicants”). The applications' dates of introduction are also tabulated in the Annex.

On 4 September 2007 one of the applicants, Ms Skripka Nadezhda Yegorovna, died, and her daughter, Ms Skripka Oksana Vasiliyevna, adopted her application. On an unspecified date another applicant, Mr Maznitsa Dmitriy Anatolyevich, died, but no heir showed interest in pursuing his application.

The applicants were represented by Mr I. Novikov, a lawyer practising in Novosibirsk. The Russian Government (“the Government”) were represented by Mrs V. Milinchuk, former Representative of the Russian Federation at the European Court of Human Rights.

The President of the First Section decided to communicate the applications to the Government. It was also decided to examine the merits of the applications at the same time as their admissibility (Article 29 § 3) and to join the applications (Rule 42 of the Rules of Court).

THE FACTS

The applicants are pensioners. They sued a pension authority for miscalculating their pensions. The Neryungri Town Court of Yakutia held for the applicants. The Supreme Court of Yakutia upheld those judgments on appeal and they became binding. Later, on the pension authority's request, the Presidium of the Supreme Court of Yakutia quashed the judgments on supervisory review because it considered that the courts below had misinterpreted material law. The dates of the court decisions are tabulated in the Annex.

THE LAW

I. ALLEGED VIOLATION OF ARTICLE 6 OF THE CONVENTION AND ARTICLE 1 OF PROTOCOL No. 1

The applicants complained under Articles 6 and 13 of the Convention, and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 about the quashing of their judgments. The Court considers it appropriate to examine this complaint under Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 only. Insofar as relevant, these Articles read as follows:

Article 6 § 1

“In the determination of his civil rights and obligations ..., everyone is entitled to a fair ... hearing ... by [a] ... tribunal...”

Article 1 of Protocol No. 1

“Every natural or legal person is entitled to the peaceful enjoyment of his possessions. No one shall be deprived of his possessions except in the public interest and subject to the conditions provided for by law and by the general principles of international law.

The preceding provisions shall not, however, in any way impair the right of a State to enforce such laws as it deems necessary to control the use of property in accordance with the general interest or to secure the payment of taxes or other contributions or penalties.”

A. Admissibility

The Government argued that the applications were inadmissible.

The proceedings in question had been outside the sphere of Article 6 because they had concerned pension laws of a general application.

Supervisory review had been a legitimate feature of Russia's legal system. The judgments had had to be quashed because they had been based on a misapplication of law and hence had contained a fundamental defect. The supervisory review had aimed to ensure a uniform application of pension laws and hence promoted legal certainty. The domestic procedure for supervisory review had been respected. The supervisory review had been set in motion by a party to the proceedings and had happened shortly after the judgments had become binding.

Annulment of binding judgments had been legitimate in a democratic society and known, for example, to such countries as Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Besides, the Committee of Ministers of the Council of Europe had found that Russia's supervisory-review procedure had improved.

In the cases at hand, the supervisory review had not breached Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 because the authorities left to the applicants the sums paid before the quashing. Besides, since the Presidium had in the end found that the applicants' claims had been unfounded, they had not had a “possession” within the meaning of Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

The applicants insisted that their applications were admissible.

The judgments had been correct. The Presidium's disagreement with the lower courts' reading of the law had not justified the quashing. Even though the State had left to the applicants the sums paid before the quashing, these sums had still been lower that they should have been under the judgments.

The Court notes, first, that Mr Maznitsa has died and that no heir has shown interest in pursuing his part of application no. 6727/07. Furthermore, in accordance with Article 37 § 1 in fine, the Court finds no special circumstances regarding respect for human rights as defined in the Convention and its Protocols which require the continued examination of that application. In view of the above, it is appropriate to strike Mr Maznitsa's part of application no. 6727/07 out of the list.

As to the other applicants, the Court finds that their disputes concerned their individual pensions and hence fell within the ambit of Article 6 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 (see Magomedov v. Russia, no. 20111/03, § 16, 4 December 2008).

The Court notes that the applications are not manifestly ill-founded within the meaning of Article 35 § 3 of the Convention. It further notes that they are not inadmissible on any other grounds. They must therefore be declared admissible.

B. Merits

The Court has earlier found violations of Article 6 § 1 and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1 where, like in the present cases, supervisory review was used to quash a binding judgment on the ground of an alleged misinterpretation of material law (see, for example, Kot v. Russia, no. 20887/03, § 29, 18 January 2007). There is no reason to depart from that finding in the present case.

There has, accordingly, been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1.

II. APPLICATION OF ARTICLE 41 OF THE CONVENTION

Article 41 of the Convention provides:

“If the Court finds that there has been a violation of the Convention or the Protocols thereto, and if the internal law of the High Contracting Party concerned allows only partial reparation to be made, the Court shall, if necessary, afford just satisfaction to the injured party.”

The applicants set out claims for just satisfaction in their initial application forms, but failed to resubmit these claims at the appropriate stage of the proceedings, i.e. after notice of the applications had been given to the Government.

Nevertheless, the Court considers it reasonable in the circumstances of the present applications to grant the applicants just satisfaction ad hoc (see Levochkina v. Russia, no. 944/02, §§ 53–55, 5 July 2007). Making its assessment on an equitable and reasonable basis, the Court awards each applicant 2,000 euros in respect of pecuniary damage, non-pecuniary damage, and costs and expenses.

FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY

Decides to join the applications;

Decides to strike out of its list of cases Mr Maznitsa's part of application no. 6727/07;

Declares the other applications admissible;

Holds that there has been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention and Article 1 of Protocol No. 1;

Holds

(a) that the respondent State is to pay each applicant, within three months from the date on which the judgment becomes final in accordance with Article 44 § 2 of the Convention, EUR 2,000 (two thousand euros), plus any tax that may be chargeable, in respect of pecuniary damage, non-pecuniary damage, and costs and expenses, to be converted into Russian roubles at the rate applicable at the date of settlement;

(b) that from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement simple interest shall be payable on the above amounts at a rate equal to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the default period plus three percentage points;

Done in English, and notified in writing on 28 May 2009, pursuant to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.

Søren Nielsen Christos Rozakis
Registrar President

ANNEX

Appl. no.	Introduced on	Name of Applicant	Born	Judgment of	Binding on	Quashed on
32865/06	17/06/06	Senchenko Naylya Rukhkhulovna	1940	01/04/04	12/05/04	09/02/06
		Dmitriyeva Alevtina Ivanovna	1952	01/04/04	12/05/04	09/02/06
		Dmitriyeva Margarita Petrovna	1939	01/04/04	12/05/04	09/02/06
		Levitskiy Nikolay Savelyevich	1934	01/04/04	12/05/04	09/02/06
		Levitskaya Natalya Aleksandrovna	1936	01/04/04	12/05/04	09/02/06
		Lebedeva Vera Yevdokimovna	1949	01/04/04	12/05/04	09/02/06
		Makusheva Svetlana Aleksandrovna	1935	01/04/04	12/05/04	09/02/06
		Moskaleva Galina Yegorovna	1950	01/04/04	12/05/04	09/02/06
		Moskalev Nikolay Vasilyevich	1946	01/04/04	12/05/04	09/02/06
		Plakhotnichenko Pavel Igorevich	1946	01/04/04	12/05/04	09/02/06
		Spiridonova Taisiya Vasilyevna	1949	01/04/04	12/05/04	09/02/06
3137/07	29/11/06	Zhmurin Yuriy Viktorovich	1948	03/05/04	28/03/05	27/07/06
		Karbovskaya Galina Ivanovna	1950	03/05/04	28/03/05	27/07/06
3158/07	01/12/06	Chumakova Anna Dmitriyevna	1944	05/10/04	21/03/05	24/08/06
5650/07	15/11/06	Sagaydakova Lyudmila Vasilyevna	1940	05/10/04	21/03/05	24/08/06
		Demakova Natalya Vladislavovna	1951	05/10/04	21/03/05	24/08/06
		Kozlova Lyudmila Alekseyevna	1940	05/10/04	21/03/05	24/08/06
		Korshikova Vera Pavlovna	1934	05/10/04	21/03/05	24/08/06
		Khvorova Lyubov Alekseyevna	1949	05/10/04	21/03/05	24/08/06
		Muzyreva Nina Vasilyevna	1949	05/10/04	21/03/05	24/08/06
		Myzyrev Yuriy Pavlovich	1943	05/10/04	21/03/05	24/08/06
		Ilchuk Valeriy Georgiyevich	1950	05/10/04	21/03/05	24/08/06
		Kazarenko Vladimir Savelyevich	1930	05/10/04	21/03/05	24/08/06
		Labzin Nikolay Ivanovich	1945	05/10/04	21/03/05	24/08/06
5654/07	17/11/06	Ostrova Lyudmila Petrovna	1952	30/11/04	21/03/05	27/07/06
5657/07	29/12/06	Matveyeva Lidiya Ivanovna	1948	21/04/05	06/06/05	12/10/06
		Loseva Tamara Moiseyevna	1954	21/04/05	06/06/05	12/10/06
		Solovyova Galina Stepanovna	1946	21/04/05	06/06/05	12/10/06
5663/07	17/11/06	Loginova Tamara Ivanovna	1941	28/09/04	21/03/05	24/08/06
6727/07	01/10/06	Vasilyeva Nina Leonidovna	1945	17/03/05	18/04/05	27/07/06
		Doruda Yevgeniy Nikiforovich	1945	17/03/05	18/04/05	27/07/06
		Lefterova Lyudmila Aleksandrovna	1954	17/03/05	18/04/05	27/07/06
		Maznitsa Dmitriy Anatolyevich	1971	17/03/05	18/04/05	27/07/06
		Podozyorov Vladimir Mikhaylovich	1949	17/03/05	18/04/05	27/07/06
		Fyodorova Mariya Lukinichna	1954	17/03/05	18/04/05	27/07/06
6822/07	29/12/06	Vinnik Grigoriy Yakovlevich	1949	23/03/05	04/05/05	24/08/06
6828/07	29/12/06	Sharshavina Lyubov Demyanovna	1954	17/03/05	18/04/05	24/08/06
6846/07	22/12/06	Pyankov Viktor Arkadyevich	1950	28/06/05	01/08/05	16/11/06
		Pyankova Mariya Mikhaylovna	1950	28/06/05	01/08/05	16/11/06
8553/07	12/01/07	Krupa Tamara Ivanovna	1947	04/03/05	18/04/05	24/08/06
8560/07	16/01/07	Lebid Roman Petrovich	1963	18/11/04	21/03/05	27/07/06
11576/07	11/12/06	Burlakova Tatyana Andreyevna	1957	22/11/04	21/03/05	13/07/06
		Vintovkina Nadezhda Alekseyevna	1954	22/11/04	21/03/05	13/07/06
11578/07	08/11/06	Torlova Tatyana Nikitichna	1953	05/10/04	23/03/05	27/07/06
11582/07	09/11/06	Avdeyeva Valentina Stepanovna	1948	27/09/04	21/03/05	27/07/06
		Ovechkin Grigoriy Pavlovich	1949	27/09/04	21/03/05	27/07/06
11583/07	11/12/06	Bystrov Aleksandr Mikhaylovich	1953	16/08/04	21/03/05	27/07/06
11584/07	11/12/06	Belyayev Viktor Fyodorovich	1939	17/03/05	18/04/05	27/07/06
11585/07	07/11/06	Shipitsyna Lyudmila Georgiyevna	1949	30/11/04	23/03/05	24/08/06
12966/07	02/01/07	Ananyeva Tamara Nikolayevna	1950	31/03/05	08/06/05	27/07/06
13830/07	15/02/07	Samikova Lyudmila Alekseyevna	1954	30/03/05	06/06/05	16/11/06
		Yesipenko Nikolay Stepanovich	1947	30/03/05	06/06/05	16/11/06
13831/07	11/02/07	Gredasova Lyubov Vasilyevna	1951	07/04/05	06/06/05	16/11/06
13833/07	15/02/07	Kim Lev Borisovich	1949	09/03/05	11/04/05	24/08/06
13835/07	15/02/07	Kostovarov Aleksandr Mikhaylovich	1952	23/03/05	23/05/05	16/11/06
19001/07	21/03/07	Varnakova Larisa Aleksandrovna	1952	21/04/05	29/06/05	19/10/06
		Morozova Nadezhda Alekseyevna	1948	21/04/05	29/06/05	19/10/06
		Skripka Nadezhda Yegorovna	1947	21/04/05	29/06/05	19/10/06
		Fritz Galina Fyodorovna	1935	21/04/05	29/06/05	19/10/06
19003/07	16/02/07	Derevyannykh Valentina Mikhaylovna	1956	28/06/05	01/08/05	30/11/06
		Davletov Talgat Shakirovich	1950	28/06/05	01/08/05	30/11/06
		Oleynikova Vera Georgiyevna	1955	28/06/05	01/08/05	30/11/06
		Ryazanova Svetlana Ivanovna	1962	28/06/05	01/08/05	30/11/06
		Pavlik Pyotr Nikitovich	1949	28/06/05	01/08/05	30/11/06
19736/07	07/03/07	Fedko Vladimir Mikhaylovich	1950	10/06/05	06/07/05	12/10/06
19738/07	01/03/07	Shumikhina Lyudmila Mikhaylovna	1946	07/04/05	06/06/05	12/10/06
19740/07	01/03/07	Gaponova Olga Aleksandrovna	1954	07/04/05	06/06/05	12/10/06
		Drozhzhina Galina Alekseyevna	1948	07/04/05	06/06/05	12/10/06
19741/07	01/03/07	Aleksandrov Nikolay Mikhaylovich	1954	27/06/05	27/07/05	12/10/06
19744/07	23/02/07	Veretelnik Anatoliy Mikhaylovich	1947	21/03/05	23/05/05	12/10/06`
19746/07	27/02/07	Godunova Natalya Ivanovna	1954	08/04/05	08/06/05	16/11/06
		Zolotukhina Tatyana Prokopyevna	1954	08/04/05	08/06/05	16/11/06
		Samoylova Lyubov Davydovna	1954	08/04/05	08/06/05	16/11/06
19749/07	23/02/07	Koreneva Lyudmila Georgiyevna	1955	29/04/05	20/06/05	09/11/06
		Skripelyova Valentina Mikhaylovna	1954	29/04/05	20/06/05	09/11/06
		Stolova Tamara Vladimirovna	1954	29/04/05	20/06/05	09/11/06
19752/07	07/03/07	Stepanova Tatyana Ivanovna	1951	04/04/05	08/06/05	16/11/06
		Sinitsyna Anna Ivanovna	1951	04/04/05	08/06/05	16/11/06
20343/07	16/02/07	Andrianova Yelena Fyodorovna	1954	11/05/05	15/06/05	16/11/06
		Dorokhov Gennadiy Petrovich	1950	11/05/05	15/06/05	16/11/06
		Davletova Firuza Shaykhenurovna	1955	11/05/05	15/06/05	16/11/06
		Kotova Olga Igorevna	1957	11/05/05	15/06/05	16/11/06
		Parshin Sergey Aleksandrovich	1956	11/05/05	15/06/05	16/11/06
		Shcherbakov Aleksandr Aleksandrovich	1949	11/05/05	15/06/05	16/11/06
		Shcherbakova Tatyana Innokentyevna	1954	11/05/05	15/06/05	16/11/06
		Kravchenko Yekaterina Filippovna	1931	11/05/05	15/06/05	16/11/06
		Pigolkina Tatyana Pavlovna	1954	11/05/05	15/06/05	16/11/06
20939/07	10/04/07	Plakhotnik Mariya Yevstafyevna	1938	26/09/05	31/10/05	16/11/06
		Kolesnikova Yelena Dmitriyevna	1943	26/09/05	31/10/05	16/11/06
		Sergeyeva Lyudmila Mikhaylovna	1945	26/09/05	31/10/05	16/11/06