British
and Irish Legal Information Institute
Freely Available British and Irish Public Legal Information
[
Home]
[
Databases]
[
World Law]
[
Multidatabase Search]
[
Help]
[
Feedback]
European Court of Human Rights
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
European Court of Human Rights >>
TROJANCZYK v. POLAND - 11219/02 [2009] ECHR 706 (28 April 2009)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/eu/cases/ECHR/2009/706.html
Cite as:
[2009] ECHR 706
[
New search]
[
Contents list]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
FOURTH
SECTION
CASE OF TROJAŃCZYK v. POLAND
(Application
no. 11219/02)
JUDGMENT
(revision)
STRASBOURG
28
April 2009
This
judgment will become final in the circumstances set out in Article 44
§ 2 of the Convention. It may be subject to editorial
revision.
In the case of Trojańczyk v. Poland (request for revision of
the judgment of 9 January 2007),
The
European Court of Human Rights (Fourth Section), sitting as a Chamber
composed of:
Nicolas Bratza, President,
Lech
Garlicki,
Ljiljana Mijović,
David Thór
Björgvinsson,
Ján Šikuta,
Päivi
Hirvelä,
Mihai Poalelungi, judges,
and
Lawrence Early, Section
Registrar,
Having
deliberated in private on 7 April 2009,
Delivers
the following judgment, which was adopted on that date:
PROCEDURE
The
case originated in an application
(no. 11219/02) against the
Republic of Poland lodged with the Court
on 16 July 2001 under
Article 34 of the Convention for the Protection of
Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (“the Convention”)
by Ms B. Trojańczyk, the applicant.
In
a judgment delivered on 9 January 2007, the Court held that there had
been a violation of Article 6 § 1 of the Convention on account
of the excessive length of the proceedings in the applicant’s
case. The Court also decided to award the applicant 5,400 euros (EUR)
for non pecuniary damage and dismissed the remainder of the
claims for just satisfaction.
On
1 August 2007 the Government informed the Court that they had learned
that the applicant had died on 7 November 2006. They accordingly
requested revision of the judgment within the meaning of Rule 80 of
the Rules of Court.
On
4 November 2008 the Court considered the request for revision and
decided to give the applicant’s representative three weeks in
which to submit any observations.
THE LAW
THE REQUEST FOR REVISION
The
Government requested revision of the judgment of 9 January 2007,
which it had been unable to execute because the applicant had died
before the judgment had been adopted. Mr Michał Trojańczyk
and Mr Maciej Trojańczyk are heirs, as certified by the
decision of the Warsaw District Court of 1 October 2007.
The
Court considers that the judgment of 9 January 2007 should be revised
pursuant to Rule 80 of the Rules of Court, the relevant parts of
which provide:
“A party may, in the event of the discovery of a
fact which might by its nature have a decisive influence and which,
when a judgment was delivered, was unknown to the Court and could not
reasonably have been known to that party, request the Court ... to
revise that judgment.
...”
Having
regard to the short period of time elapsed between the Court’s
judgment in the case and the death of the applicant (see paragraphs 2
and 3 above) and to its established case law (see, among other
authorities, Armando Grasso v. Italy (revision), no.
48411/99, § 5-7, 29 April 2003), the Court decides to award the
heirs jointly the amounts it previously awarded to the deceased
applicant, namely EUR 5,400 for non-pecuniary damage.
The
Court considers it appropriate that the default interest should be
based on the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank, to
which should be added three percentage points.
FOR THESE REASONS, THE COURT UNANIMOUSLY
Decides to revise the judgment of 9 January 2007;
accordingly,
Holds
(a) that
the respondent State is to pay jointly to the heirs of Mrs
B. Trojańczyk, within three months from the date on which
the judgment becomes final in accordance with Article 44 § 2
of the Convention, EUR 5,400 (five thousand four hundred euros) in
respect of non-pecuniary damage, to be converted into Polish zlotys
at the rate applicable at the date of settlement, plus any tax that
may be chargeable;
(b) that
from the expiry of the above-mentioned three months until settlement
simple interest shall be payable on the above amount at a rate equal
to the marginal lending rate of the European Central Bank during the
default period plus three percentage points.
Done in English, and notified in writing on 28 April 2009, pursuant
to Rule 77 §§ 2 and 3 of the Rules of Court.
Lawrence Early Nicolas Bratza
Registrar President