If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?
Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
For the whole decision click here: o41300
Result
Section 3(6) - Opposition successful in respect of some of the goods specified.
Section 5(2) - Opposition successful in respect of the remainder of the goods specified.
Section 5(3) - Opposition dismissed.
Points Of Interest
Summary
The opposition was based on the opponents' mark PANASONIC. Under Section 5(2) the Hearing Officer found the opposition successful in respect of certain goods specified in the application. The marks were not however, sufficiently similar as to allow a finding for the opponents under Section 5(3). The remaining goods in the specification were refused under Section 3(6). The Hearing Officer made no finding under Section 5(4).