Subject_1 THIRLAGE.
Alexander Hamilton
v.
Sir John Ramsay
1686 .December .
Case No.No. 50.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
The Lords repelled this reason of astriction, viz. That the defenders had been in constant use of coming to the pursuer’s mill, for the space of forty years, unless
it were also alleged, that they and their authors paid the astricted multures, or that there was some sentence or other constitution, seeing coming to a mill, and paying outsucken multure, is but actus voluntatis.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting