Irish Competition Authority Decisions
You are here:
BAILII >>
Databases >>
Irish Competition Authority Decisions >>
Collins/Butler/O'Brien [1995] IECA 454 (18th December, 1995)
URL: http://www.bailii.org/ie/cases/IECompA/1995/454.html
Cite as:
[1995] IECA 454
[
New search]
[
Printable RTF version]
[
Help]
Collins/Butler/O'Brien [1995] IECA 454 (18th December, 1995)
COMPETITION
AUTHORITY
Competition
Authority Decision of 18 December 1995 relating to a proceeding under Section 4
of the Competition Act, 1991.
Notification
no. CA/30/95 - Collins / Butler / O'Brien.
Decision
no. 454
Price £0.50
£0.90
incl. postage
Notification
no. CA/30/95 - Collins / Butler / O'Brien.
Decision
no. 454
Introduction
1. This
decision concerns a Partnership agreement dated 4 August 1995 between Richard
A. Collins, Thomas M. Butler and John Noel O'Brien. The agreement was notified
on 29 August, 1995 with a request for a certificate under
Section 4 (4) of the
Competition Act, 1991 or, in the event of a refusal by the Competition
Authority to grant a certificate, a licence under
Section 4 (2) of the
Competition Act.
The
Facts
(a)
The subject of the Notification
2. The
notification concerns a partnership agreement between Richard A. Collins,
Thomas M. Butler and John Noel O'Brien for the setting up of an auditors and
accountants practice, primarily for farmers, under the title of 'Collins,
Butler, O'Brien', as an addition to the existing business of agricultural
consultants carried on by Richard A. Collins and Thomas M. Butler (formerly
known as Collins, Butler & Company).
(b)
The parties involved
3.
Richard A. Collins and Thomas M. Butler carry on the business of an
agricultural consultancy service under the titles of Farm Business Advisers Ltd
and Farm Business Advisors (Bandon) Ltd, of which they are the majority
shareholders. The business of auditors and accountants is carried on as an
ancillary business from their offices at Fermoy and Bandon, Co. Cork and
Bagenalstown, Co. Carlow. John Noel O'Brien - a certified public accountant -
joined the auditing and accounting side of the practice as a partner.
(c)
The service and the market
4. The
service involved in this notification concerns the provision of auditing and
accounting services, primarily to farmers, as an ancilliary business to that of
agricultural consultancy services carried on by the original partners at three
locations. These are situated in Fermoy and Bandon, Co. Cork and Bagenalstown,
Co. Carlow. There are a number of other accountancy firms located in each of
these towns as well as those located in neighbouring towns and also Cork city,
in the case of the two Co. Cork locations. The market therefore is for the
provision of auditing and accounting services in these regions.
(d)
The arrangements
5. The
notified partnership agreement was made on 4 August 1995, but commenced as and
from 1 April 1994, to establish a partnership to include the two original
partners in Collins, Butler & Company and the new partner John Noel O'Brien
under the new title of Collins Butler O'Brien. The business will be carried on
at the locations used by the former partnership at Fermoy and Bandon, Co. Cork
and Bagenalstown, Co. Carlow. The capital and assets of the new partnership
will be those of the original firm - Collins, Butler & Company and the
capital will continue to be divided between them in the same proportion as
their contributions.
6. There
are requirements covering the keeping of accounts and records, insurance,
holidays and the obligations of the partners relating to the promotion and
running of the partnership. The two original partners will devote as much time
as they see fit to the business and they are also allowed to engage in any
other business that does not compete directly with the business of the
partnership. The new partner - Mr. O'Brien - is required to devote all his
attention to this business. The consent of the majority of the partners is
required for certain actions such as giving guarantees, entering into bonds,
assigning or mortaging a share in the partnership to another person or to
borrow money in the name of the partnership. The new partner also has an option
to purchase an increased share of profits in the partnership.
7. Under
clause 21.1 of the agreement, an outgoing partner shall not for 18 months after
ceasing to be a partner be engaged in the practice of auditing or accounting
within a ten mile radius of any of the premises of the partnership. In
addition, the outgoing partner is restricted for the same period from
soliciting any person who was a client of the partnership in the preceding two
years.
(e)
Submissions of the parties
8. The
parties submitted, in support of their request for a certificate, that these
arrangements did not have the object or effect of preventing, restricting or
distorting competition in any part of the State. The arrangements were merely
for the purpose of preserving the goodwill of the partnership business which
should not have any effect generally on the distortion of competition. They
parties also submitted arguments in support of their request for a licence, but
these are not considered here.
Assessment
(a)
Section 4(1)
9.
Section
4(1) of the
Competition Act states that 'all agreements between undertakings,
decisions by associations of undertakings and concerted practices which have as
their object or effect the prevention, restriction or distortion of competition
in trade in any goods or services in the State or in any part of the State are
prohibited and void'.
(b) The
Undertakings and the Agreement
10.
Section 3 (1) of the
Competition Act defines an undertaking as ´a person
being an individual, a body corporate or an unincorporated body of persons
engaged for gain in the production, supply or distribution of goods or the
provision of a service.' The parties to the present agreement are Richard A.
Collins, Thomas M. Butler and John Noel O'Brien who are engaged as partners in
the provision of auditing and accounting services for gain and are therefore
undertakings
[1]
within the meaning of
the Act. The partnership agreement is therefore an
agreement between undertakings.
(c)
Applicability of Section 4 (1)
11. The
Authority has indicated previously that it did not regard partnerships as being
in contravention of
the Act
per
se
,
but partnership arrangements might be in breach of
the Act by virtue of certain
restrictive clauses contained therein
[2].
The requirements in this agreement between the three partners to carry out
certain functions relating to the management, promotion and operation of the
business of the firm cannot be said to offend against
Section 4 (1), since such
obligations are essential for the operation of the business.
12. Clause
21.1 of the agreement contains two restrictions on any partner who leaves the
partnership. The first one states that an outgoing partner shall not for 18
months after ceasing to be a partner be engaged in the practice of auditing or
accounting within a ten mile radius of any of the premises of the partnership.
In addition, the second restriction states that the outgoing partner is
prevented for the same period from soliciting any person who was a client of
the partnership in the preceding two years. The purpose of these restrictions
is to protect the goodwill of the business in the event that one of the
partners leaves the firm and sets up his own business in opposition to the
partnership's business. The Authority has stated that restrictions to protect
the existing goodwill of a partnership, in the case of the sale by one or more
partners of their interest in the business, do not offend against
Section 4(1)
provided the restrictions are limited in terms of the duration, geographical
coverage and subject matter to that which was necessary for the complete
transfer of the goodwill.
13. The
name and nature of the business, i.e. the provision of auditing and accounting
services under the names of the three partners, the nature of the service -
there are only three partners and consequently, each would be in personal
contact with their individual clients, and the loyalty of their individual
clients to each partner require the protection of the interests or goodwill of
the business in the event that one partner leaves. The restriction in this
agreement is for a term of 18 months, within a defined territory, namely a
radius of ten miles of each of the three premises owned by the partnership and
this in the Authority's view does not exceed what is necessary to protect the
goodwill of the business. Consequently, clause 21.1 does not offend against
Section 4 (1) of
the Act.
The
Decision
15. In
the opinion of the Authority, Richard A. Collins, Thomas M. Butler and John
Noel O'Brien are undertakings within the meaning of
Section 3 (1) of the
Competition Act, 1991 and the notified partnership agreement is an agreement
between undertakings. In the Authority's opinion, the notified agreement does
not offend against
Section 4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
The
Certificate
16. The
Competition Authority has issued the following certificate:
The
Competition Authority certifies that, in its opinion, on the basis of the facts
in its possession, the partnership agreement between Richard A. Collins, Thomas
M. Butler and John Noel O'Brien of 4 August 1995, notified under
Section 7 on
29 August 1995 (notification no. CA/30/95), does not offend against
Section
4(1) of the
Competition Act, 1991.
For
the Competition Authority
Patrick
Massey
Member
18
December, 1995.
[ ] 1
Dec. no. 1 of 2/4/1992, para. 23, - Nallen / O'Toole - where the Authority
decided that partners in a business were undertakings.
[ ]2
Dec. no. 333 of 10/6/1994 - Doyle / Moffit (New Ross), para. 23.
© 1995 Irish Competition Authority