CO/3486/2003 
Neutral Citation Number: [2003] EWHC 2776 (Admin)
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE 
QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION  
THE ADMINISTRATIVE COURT 
Royal Courts of Justice 
Strand
London WC2 

Friday, 7th November 2003
 
B E F O R E:

MR JUSTICE OWEN 

- - - - - - -
THE QUEEN ON THE APPLICATION OF RONALD
(CLAIMANT)

-v- 

THE LONDON BOROUGH OF RICHMOND UPON THAMES
(DEFENDANT) 
 - - - - - - -
Computer-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of 
Smith Bernal Wordwave Limited
190 Fleet Street  London EC4A 2AG
Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838
(Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
 - - - - - - -
Neither party attended or was represented.
 - - - - - - -
J U D G M E N T 

1.	MR JUSTICE OWEN:  In this matter there will be an order by consent in the terms agreed.  The consent order included the direction that the court determine the issue of liability for costs on the basis of the parties' written submissions and the papers.  
2.	In consenting to the appeal being allowed, the respondent conceded that the Special Educational Needs and Disability Tribunal had erred in law.  It did so principally by reason of a failure on behalf of the respondent authority to supply critical information.  In those circumstances, it is plainly appropriate for the respondent to be ordered to pay at least some parts of the appellant's costs.  
3.	By a letter dated 30th September of this year, the appellant's solicitors invited agreement to an order that 75 per cent of the appellant's costs of the appeal be paid by the respondent.  The proposal was intended to reflect the fact that the grounds of appeal were not wholly based on the Tribunal's error.  That offer, which in my judgment was extremely reasonable, was rejected.  
4.	In all the circumstances, I am satisfied that the appropriate order is that the respondent do pay 75 per cent of the appellant's costs of the appeal, and secondly do pay the costs incurred in this costs application, namely the costs incurred after 16th September 2003.
5.	Thank you.