If you found BAILII useful today, would you consider making a contribution?
Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Thank you very much for your support!
Page: 59↓
( ante, vol. ii. p. 245).
A pursuer who sued for £34, 160. 6d., and obtained a verdict from a jury for £30,
Page: 60↓
16s., held to have been substantially successful, and allowed full expenses.
This case was tried at the July sittings. The pursuer claimed £34. 16s. 6d. as due to him by the late Mr Maclean. The jury found for the pursuer except in regard to two items of £3, 10s. and 10s. 6d. This verdict was to-day applied.
The pursuer having moved for expenses, the defenders objected on the ground if the explanations made by the pursuer in giving his evidence had been made before the action raised, the sum found due would have been paid. The Court, however, allowed expenses.
The
Counsel for Pursuer— Mr Orphoot. Agents— Stewart & Wilson, W.S.
Counsel for Defenders— Mr Inglis. Agents— H. & A. Inglis, W.S.