In this case of Thomas Burnet of Criggie, to whom his father disponed an estate on which he was infeft, held of the Crown, and immediately disponed it back to his father, to be held blench of himself, the Lords repelled the objection, six to five. Pro were, Justice-Clerk, Strichen, Kilkerran, Monzie, Murkle, Leven. Con. were, Drummore, Haining, Dunn, Tinwald, et ego, and the President seemed to be of our opinion. 19th June 1746 Altered, and sustained the objection. Vide that date, (as follows:)
A reclaiming bill was advised against our interlocutor, marked 30th July last, in the case of Thomas Burnet of Criggie, which we altered, and sustained the objection against his vote. For this last interlocutor were, President, Drummore, Haining, Dun, Monzie, Tinwald, et ego. Con. was, Minto. Strichen would not vote. All the rest absent.