[1609] Mor 2238
Subject_1 CITATION.
Subject_2 SECT. XXIV. Citation in Poinding of the Ground.
Date: Spottiswood
v.
The Lairds of Westfortune and Wauchtoun
9 December 1609
Case No.No 114.
A compriser not infeft need not be called.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Thomas Spottiswood in Haddington pursued the Laird of West Fortoun to hear and see the readiest goods being upon the ground of his lands of Fortoun poinded, for payment of an annualrent which Spottiswood had furth thereof, for diverse bygone years. It was alleged he had not called all parties having interest, to wit, Patrick Hepburn of Newmills, whose interest he could not mis-know, because he had comprised the lands; and, in his comprising, this pursuer compeared, and his annualrent was reserved. It was answered, That the process of comprising made him not a necessary party unless he were seized; and, therefore, he not being seized, this pursuer had no necessity to warn him; which answer the Lords found relevant. Thereafter the Laird of Wauchtoun being admitted for his interest as superior to Fortoun, and having declarator of his liferent, alleged, that no decreet could be now given for poinding of the ground during Fortoun's lifetime, because Thomas Spottiswood's sasine being only a base infeftment, not confirmed by the superior, and not having taken effect by possession before the said Laird of Fortoun's liferent fell, and was declared to appertain to the pursuer, the land which was now fallen in his hand as superior, by declarator, could not be burdened with the said private annualrent, no more than if another had been infeft by Fortoun, and confirmed by the supeperior; or if he resigned the lands in the superior's hands ad perpetuam remanentiam, the ground could not thereafter have been poinded for a private annualrent, which had taken effect by possession. Notwithstanding whereof the Lords repelled the exception; and found, that the gift of liferent and declarator could not stay poinding of the ground for the annualrent; the rather because the pursuer had registered his contract, and charged Fortoun to make payment before Wauchton's declarator.
The electronic version of the text was provided by the Scottish Council of Law Reporting