If you found BAILII useful today, could you please make a contribution?
Your donation will help us maintain and extend our databases of legal information. No contribution is too small. If every visitor this month donates, it will have a significant impact on BAILII's ability to continue providing free access to the law.
Click here to view a pdf copy of this documet : PDF Copy
Although when a man alienates lands to be holden of himself, he needs no new sasine after redemption, because he remains in the radical right; yet if the alienated lands be holden of the reverser's superior, the Lords have found, That he must be again infeft upon redemption, except the same be taken holden of the superior by comprising; because in that case the proprietor redeeming within seven years, needs no new sasine, the law presuming him to have remained still seised when he redeems within the legal.
*** This case is No. 1. p. 11335. voce Presumption.