KING'S BENCH DIVISION
Strand, London, WC2A 2LL |
||
B e f o r e :
____________________
Ahmed Mahmoud EL-TAWIL |
Appellant |
|
- and - |
||
(1) Megan LARRINAGA (2) Rob McKEON (3) Paolo de MARCO (4) The Medical Practitioners Tribunal Service (5) The General Medical Council and its Registrar |
Respondents |
____________________
Alexis Hearnden (instructed by GMC Legal) for the Respondents (1)-(5)
Hearing dates: 21.05.2025
____________________
Crown Copyright ©
Mr Justice Sweeting:
Introduction
Preliminary Matters
"The Appellant is directed, again, to (a) the need to make any applications to the court in accordance with CPR Part 23, in good time before any hearing; (b) the need to provide expert medical evidence to support his assertions; and (c) the specific matters that expert evidence should address, as set out in the Respondent's submissions at [6], but copied here for reference:
"The medical evidence required to demonstrate that the party is unable to attend a hearing and participate in the trial…should identify the medical attendant and give details of his familiarity with the party's medical condition (detailing all recent consultations), should identify with particularity what the patient's medical condition is and the features of that condition which (in the medical attendant's opinion) prevent participation in the trial process, should provide a reasoned prognosis and should give the court some confidence that what is being expressed is an independent opinion after a proper examination. It is being tendered as expert evidence. The court can then consider what weight to attach to that opinion, and what arrangements might be made (short of an adjournment) to accommodate a party's difficulties. No judge is bound to accept expert evidence: even a proper medical report falls to be considered simply as part of the material as a whole (including the previous conduct of the case)": Levy v Ellis- Carr [2012] EWHC 63 (Ch), per Norris J."
Factual Background
Legal Framework
Discussion
"THERE are very clear lobbies aimed at stealing the eggs of the mothers and selling them to the rich without their knowledge and consent and on the same time, either the criminal embryologists do not put eggs or week eggs in the catheters, or if the Embryologists refused , the gynecologists prescribe to the women high doses of the stimulation drugs putting their lives at risk and by the end selling their eggs to the rich." (sic)
Conclusion
END